Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There are important conditions to be aware of for mothers and babies as many conditions are easier to treat if women realise sooner they are at risk of becoming unwell, so it is vital this information gets to them early


Signs the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) says women should be told to look out for include heavy or persistent vaginal bleeding, fever, a rash, headaches, shortness of breath, pain or swelling in the legs, vulval or perineal areas, and difficulty or pain in passing urine.


In babies, symptoms include a temperature above 38C, a rash, feeding less than usual, floppiness, grunting while breathing and nappies being much drier than usual.


It's useful to be aware of the NICE guidelines of the most severe complications. Hopefully, these will not be relevant for you but forewarned is forearmed.


The relevant pages contained in the NICE guidelines which have advice on life-threatening conditions for mothers and babies start on page 22:

http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10988/30143/30143.pdf


NESTLondon are a local group of specialists in their chosen fields with experience in and a passion for the areas of fertility, pregnancy and parenthood. Check our wesite for further information at: [www.nestlondon.com]

I'm disappointed to see that in the linked document from NICE under the heading "Common Health Problems", Postpartum Depression doesn't appear even to have its own heading. Instead "Baby Blues" are a listed condition, including the following description, "Action: If [baby blues] symptoms not resolved after 10?14 days, assess for postnatal depression, and if symptoms persist, evaluate further (urgent action)".


This makes it sound as if depression is a possible outcome of baby blues, and not a separate health problem. It also makes it sound like further evaluation and treatment are necessarily delayed 10-14 days whether or not it's depression. This can prevent practitioners and parents from correctly understanding the diagnosis of and treatment strategies for postpartum depression. Depression should be screened and referred for immediate action at the earliest time point. Indeed women should know that they can now take a self-directed online questionnaire. And any women actively seeking medical advice with symptoms that could present as depressive should not be told to come back in 10-14 days. NICE needs to be way more proactive in making women and practitioners aware of postpartum depression, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes.


Also, by grouping postpartum depression under the heading of baby blues instead of its own heading, NICE had failed in this document to mention the need to account for patient history of depression. Where there is a history of depression before, during, or after pregnancy, patients presenting with depressive symptoms should always be screened at the first opportunity and duration of symptoms should be measured in days not weeks.


This NICE document has done a very poor job of clarifying and emphasising these aspects of postpartum depression. Also, I don't see any mention of postpartum psychosis, a serious complication which can endanger the lives of both the mother and child.


Anyone woman who reports concerns over her mental well-being should be taken seriously at the point of access. It's worth noting that the EPDS is a short questionnaire for depression that is readily available for health workers and parents, and can also be accessed online for self-evaluation: http://www.postpartumhealthalliance.org/screen-test.html.

Thanks for that as I wasn't told after my labour of any possibilities that I could get an infection. I was given the impression that the labour was the worst part and then it's the babymoon afterwards .

Despite the midwife doing her regular visiting she failed to spot my infection and I ended up in hospital and then the health visitor , GP and midwife failed to spot my child's illness too and he ended up in hospital .

It was a huge shock and it's only afterwards did I realise the risks of certain infections .

No one seems to ever talk about it and I definitely think there should be more education about what to look out for after labour with regards to the health of mother and child.

Saffron, thank you for raising that very useful point about postnatal depression.


I agree that PND goes undiagnosed far too often and that too many mothers suffer in silence, alone and with an unnecessary sense of shame and guilt. It is shocking to me that mental health in general is such a taboo and PND in particular, because having a baby is sold to women like a time when they should be happy and gratified, no matter what.


What I suppose the NICE guidelines are trying to do quite badly is make a distinction between 'baby blues' and PND.


Baby blues tends to develop straight after birth (up to ten days) due to hormonal changes, the need to adjust to a new life phase, the demands of a new baby, an unprecedented amount of tiredness and lack of sleep, etc. It consists of mild symptoms which are manageable and normally go away on their own. It is so common now that is is considered normal. I would say the operational word here is manageable.


PND is instead a mental illness which develops slightly later (up to six weeks) with much more severe symptoms which are unmanageable and just doesn't go away by themselves. It presents itself with the usual signs of depression plus some specific ones like thoughts of harming the baby which can be frightening and incomprehensible, making PND even more of a taboo to talk about.

And as you say, this is when, sometime, undiagnosed and untreated PND can lead to psychosis with grave consequences.


I urge every mother who experiences persistent unmanageable symptoms to talk to their health visitors, midwives, or GP all of whom should have access to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale questionnaire.


PND is not a sign you have failed in any way or that you are less of a mother. It is a common mental health condition that affects almost a third of all mothers especially if they have a history of previous mental health, abuse, low self esteem and have no support. Seeking help is a sign of strength and care for yourself and your baby. Talking to someone is the first step to feeling better.


Barbara, from NestLondon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...