Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Many people use mouthwash for work overtime and after a meal because it is more convenience than the use of toothbrushing. Most of people buy mouthwash are youth. Most of people believe that mouth is clear after using mouthwash and smells nice, more comfortable than toothbrushing. Surely, compared with traditional toothpaste and toothbrush, oral hygiene product mouthwash has advantages such as using conveniently, saving time, however, mouthwash can take place of toothbrushing? Mouthwash is safe?


http://www.zetadental.co.uk/blog/mouthwash-is-safe-not-sure/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43433-mouthwash-is-safe-not-sure/
Share on other sites

Thank you for raising this very important issue that clearly affects a lot of Dulwich residents. I would suggest highlighting this issue to the council and stressing that it should be part of their manifesto and that we see clear action taken going forward. Not only could the use of mouthwash seriously affect the dental hygiene of Dulwich residents but any continuation of use without any formalised action could seriously affect the moral fibre of Dulwich and it?s future as an orally hygienic part of London.


If the council refuses to take any action on this I suggest we organise a peaceful rally to Westminster and maybe get other concerned localities to join forces with us. If you need any assistance please let me know as I have experience campaigning serious issues (such as the deodorant spray versus Roll on campaign of the early 2000s and the Shampoo and Conditioner 2 in 1 vs separate bottles debate a couple of years ago ? both inconclusive sadly) and can make some rather fetching placards and outfits (Mouthwash bottle outfit and a toothpaste tube outfit with gladiator style pugil sticks is an immediate idea).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...