Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Possibly because the thread was merely speculation - other than surmise there is no evidence of any crime or even fatality (criminal or otherwise). Police tapes go up for a myriad of different reasons. Until such time as there is anything actually to say, saying nothing may be understood as the best policy. At the worst it arouses fears or suspicions which may be entirely unjustified, with no obvious remedy normally of scotching them, once the speculative thread is out of the bag.
I replied on that this morning and then was deleted shortly after, my mum is the neighbour to upstairs of this person and I have known that person since I was very young there post was murder which I said on my post this morning that people should not jump to conclusions and really get a life and leave this person to rest in peace.
  • Administrator

Nigello


How can you be unimpressed by the criteria employed to remove a post when you don't know what the criteria was?


We were asked to remove it by an authority because the family had not been informed and it may cause them distress to read the thread.

Tell us the criteria! You allow speculation on some topics, not others. I can understand that some posts need to be treated in ways that are different from certain others but I don't know how you decide that, or indeed whether you have a thought-out policy at all (as opposed to a case-by-case approach).
  • Administrator

What Otta said. I just told you the criteria, we were asked to remove it.


Apart from the obvious removal of postings that are distressing, illegal, racist etc there's not really a thought out criteria. There's a bit more on the Terms of Use page but I don't think there needs to be anything so formal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder how much the rebranding is costing in total?  Could the money be used in a better way ? 
    • It's not fair to hold Corbyn's brother's views against him when he has never explicitly or implicitly endorsed them. And he has enough of his own terrible positions to criticise anyway.
    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead? Sorry Alice but we'll have to disagree on this one. This does not sound like kids just being silly; lobbing water bombs at each other is one thing, but targeting complete strangers out for a walk and minding their own business and trying to kick their dog is, in my view, no laughing matter. A group of 15 teenagers can be intimidating, not to everyone but for some it can be, especially if their behaviour is aggressive.  
    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...