Jump to content

Dulwich library phone num?


Hickory

Recommended Posts

Hi, does anyone know the real phone number for Dulwich library? The one shown on google and southwark's website go through to environmental services.

I also tried Yelp but that must have been a fax number


Alternatively, can anyone tell me if the library has a selection of business books?


Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44426-dulwich-library-phone-num/
Share on other sites

Hi,


About eight years ago, all the libraries in Southwark stopped taking calls and all calls went to a privatised call centre. Unless things have changed since then, there is no way of getting hold of the "real number" as these are only made available to other libraries, council services and the staff themselves. Of course this might have changed, but I very much doubt it.


The library does have a section of business books, but mainly aimed at people running or starting their own business, rather than business studies students. They're open tomorrow,Sunday from 12 - 4pm so you could pop down and take a look. You could also email [email protected] but I doubt you'll get an answer before next week. You can also search the catalogue online at https://capitadiscovery.co.uk/southwark/


I just did a search on subject: "business" and it threw up 312 books at Dulwich, as you will see here: http://tinyurl.com/qzxbdff Of course, not all or even most of these will be on the shelf right now.


Hope this helps!


East

They do seem to do their best to cut out access other than through a few multi-purpose numbers, such as 020 7525 2000 for all the libraries, and more. I suspect most of the library managers are probably concentrated somewhere else. Though, to be fair, many library inquiries probably can be delat with centrally.


The Dulwich library fax number is said to be Fax: 020 7525 6221. I'd be interested to know what happens if you do ring 7525 2000 and ask for Dulwich Library.


You'd best check the catalogue for whatever you're particularly looking for. I find this search page the most useful: http://capitadiscovery.co.uk/southwark/advancedsearch, and it does include location as a possible search parameter. You can experiment ad lib with keywords for search; but be prepared for some quirky responses.


Then be prepared, once you've found something you want, for not being able to find it when you visit the library. This can be because it went missing, or sometimes that it's in one of several possible different locations within the library, not necessarily primarily determined by Dewey classmark, as in the good old , pre-user-friendly days.


That said, you should be able to rely on finding one or more blocks of books on business-related subjects in any of the branches.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...