Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This makes interesting reading: a third of first-time mothers suffer depressive symptoms:

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/21/third-of-new-mothers-suffer-depressive-symptoms

And particularly this bit:

'And more women are depressed when their child turns four than at any time before that, according to the study, which challenges the notion that mothers' birth-related mental struggles usually happen at or after the baby's arrival. The findings have led to calls for all women giving birth in the UK to have their mental health monitored until their child turns five to ensure that more of those experiencing difficulties are identified.'

It is certainly an interesting read and from my experience depression and anxiety can be a difficulty well past the postnatal period - and this could be for all sorts of reasons, including changes in lifestyle and work (or becoming a SAHM), changes in the relationship with partners etc. However, in the case of this study I also wonder if they controlled for women having a second child in the four years since they had their first?
Actually I just realised that they did in fact control for this (must have skipped this before) and it showed that women with only one child were more depressed - now that makes me wonder if they controlled for reasons why mum only has one child. Maybe those who have made the decision to have one child are less depressed than those who may have fertility problems?

"Interestingly, women in the study with one child at the time of our 4-year follow-up tended to have

had more relationship transitions, and were more likely to have experienced intimate partner abuse

and a greater number of stressful life events and social health issues in the preceding 12 months.

They were also more likely to have a low income, and to have experienced depression in pregnancy

and the first 12 months postpartum."


That's from the Maternal Health Study policy brief provided by the paper's authors. It's downloadable from https://www.mcri.edu.au/research/research-projects/maternal-health-study-2014/news-and-events/. There's also a video. The paper itself seems not to have reached the BJOG site yet: presumably it'll be in the June issue. When it does it's likely thst non-subscribers will only be able to see the abstract.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...