Jump to content

WARNING: Large scale cyber attack will hit in 2 weeks, be prepared!!!


Recommended Posts

I use Carbonite, which automatically backs up both my laptop and my external hard drive (permanently connected to the laptop). You can get a free trial before committing to it.


http://www.carbonite.com/online-backup/free-trial?catid=200200&mkwid=svffKeNjk|dc&adnumber=38157719581&cm_mmc=ppc-_-google-_-38157719581-_-svffKeNjk&c3apimn=vffKeNjk&gclid=CjkKEQjwqsCcBRDt7_Gts5a91YYBEiQAm-wYEZ3RN3Ncd1k1JBU5DU_tsMnigZutPvqG4pzV1UDntunw_wcB


But there are many similar services.


It's worth it just for peace of mind in my opinion.

Storage costs are constantly plummeting, but if it's literally backups you'd be daft to use external hard drives, when something like blu-ray will be a fraction of the cost, physical size and will be much safer.


You could avoid all those moving pieces by using SS drives, but again...for backup...really?

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Storage costs are constantly plummeting, but if

> it's literally backups you'd be daft to use

> external hard drives, when something like blu-ray

> will be a fraction of the cost, physical size and

> will be much safer.

>

> You could avoid all those moving pieces by using

> SS drives, but again...for backup...really?


xxxxxxx


My external hard drive is not for back-up - I don't need back-up as I'm using Carbonite, and in any case I wouldn't want to rely for back-up solely on something which could fail or be damaged.


It's for additional storage, because my ancient laptop only has an 80gb hard drive, and as I've had the external hard drive for some years, I don't particularly want to shell out money on something else when it is doing the job perfectly well.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Storage costs are constantly plummeting, but if it's literally backups you'd be daft to use

> external hard drives, when something like blu-ray will be a fraction of the cost, physical size and

> will be much safer.


Blu-ray holds max 50GB per disk, so I'd have to chop my half-TB into a whole bunch of disks, which is a time consuming task. Alternately, I can pick up a 2TB external drive for ?50 and cycle multiple backups on it.


Plus, as I don't have a blu-ray writer, so I'd have to buy one.

Of course i have a couple of external harddrives, but for all my old photos and backups of music, some discs you can tuck quietly away is just easier.


The odd hour once every few months is really all it takes.


But i get the barrier to entry thing.

Yeah, 50gb disks don't do it for me either, but that may change in the future. DVDs and other optical discs eventually succumb to disk rot. That's why I never use them for back-ups or storage anymore. They just don't last forever.


So I use high quality drives and seek to transfer the data to a new drive every five years. And would consider using an online storage option as a backup to that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...