Jump to content

Video conferencing - advice wanted


Minitoots

Recommended Posts

An overseas work colleage of ours uses Polycom video conferencing, and has suggested we start using it as well. As I've never had cause to need it before, I wondered if anyone who uses it can give me any more info, eg whether we would need to use Polycom or can we use another system? What equipment do we need? Does it work by a phone connection or??? We are a small design studio so don't want anything too enormous in outlay.. thanks!

The question I would ask you is what are your video conferencing requirements and needs for your business?


Do you simply want to have video and voice conversations with the other party? Or do you need to share your computers' screens and desktops for presentations/collaboration/training, etc.?


Polycom products are considered high-end enterprise/corporate systems that cost thousands of pounds depending on the kit. Do you really need that kind of solution for your business?


All video conferencing systems utilise an Internet connection. They connect to your broadband router either by cable or by Wi-Fi.

Hi TigerMountain, I've just posted a reply to you on the forum but in case you don't see it, I posted the message on behalf of my partner who is an architect, and his reply is:-


For face to face round table discussions

To show hard line CAD drawings

To show sketches and work on them live


I saw from your other posts that you have a background in IT for small businesses.

His firm are moving offices in the next couple of months and may also need help with setting up their new IT system, or maintenance of it at a later date. Is this the sort of thing you do? I don't know much about their IT set-up at the moment but can get more info if you need it.


thanks

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...