Jump to content

Point Zero Painting Taster Sessions: Sat 30th Aug and Tues 9th Sept


Recommended Posts

Welcome to the adventure of Point Zero Creativity!


The joyful and childlike process of spontaneous painting allows me to access the creativity below my conditioning, in both paint and life. The Point Zero way of self-questioning enables me to dissolve creative blocks, by addressing the heart in the face of my own judgements. In this way it brings me into contact with unknown aspects of myself, and ways of being which my ego has long since edited from my life.


Point Zero painting is about the process of creativity, rather than the product, so you don't need any art experience or "perceived talent". Just the willingness to surrender the result, to play and explore. There is only one rule at The Whistling Studio, which is that nobody ever comments about another person's painting. As facilitator, I wouldn't dream of it. Discussion focuses on our experience of the practice, and any obstacles to our freedom of expression that we encounter. The paintings are never critiqued. Ever. (In fact, when they are dry, they are turned to the wall.)


Be curious about what will happen when you know that it is alright to paint absolutely anything. When you are free to really participate in your painting, without ever standing back to judge it. The invitation is simply to come and be yourself in glorious, playful technicolour, in a place where all judgement has been suspended for your freedom. What if that was ok?



Saturday, 30th August: 10am - 1pm. ?30, all materials included.


Tuesday, 9th September: 6.30 - 9.30pm. ?30, all materials included.



You can book through my website paintingyourpathway.co.uk.


More insights on the Painting Your Pathway Facebook page.


Any questions, please contact Helena on 07947 104 135!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...