Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It might come to a shock to some that new students are being charged 5.5% interest on their loans from day one of their studies.

This means that graduates will need to be on 49K to keep pace with the interest payments.

Harsh.


Blog piece

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/andrew-cunningham/student-loan-interest_b_5758430.html

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48716-new-student-loans-at-55/
Share on other sites

I can only assume that Andrew Cunningham, Consultant Therapist to ITV, was drunk when he wrote that blog.


It may well be that he has a very important issue to raise, and if it's true then it's something we should worry about.


But having read it, I am none the wiser.


So it will fall to you, reggie, to check his facts and report back in a more coherent manner than he.

It isn't the clearest article I've ever read, but I don't know why you suggest he was drunk. It certainly is an important issue for those of us with offspring heading off to university this year. We thought, like many of our friends, that the loan was interest free, but it is indeed charged at 3% or so above the current interest rate and the interest starts mounting up from the day it is borrowed, not, as previously, when the degree is completed. This does indeed mean that some graduates will be paying off their loan for 30 years until the cut-off point, or they will be trying to avoid earning enough to pay it back - not great for encouraging young people to aspire to achieve their full potential.

New students who start this year are deemed plan 2 under a new scheme. These students will be charged 5.5% from day one of their studies until they pay off the loan or within 30 years, whichever is sooner.


The link for this is http://www.slc.co.uk/services/interest-rates.aspx


Graduates will struggle to pay the interest charged on the loan so the student loan will rise over the years.


For instance a graduate salary of ?25,000 will trigger an annual repayment of ?360 but this will not cover the interest payable (eg 5.5% on a loan of ?45,000 is ?2,475). Hence the loan increases by the difference, in this example, to ?47,115.


The effect on the student and new graduate is defeatist. With little or no hope of preventing the ballooning of their student debt, the graduate is not motivated to pay. Presenting them with an impossible debt mountain that only the very highest earners ( possible just 1% of the population) can tackle is a recipe for disengaging with the system.


The new system seems counter- productive for the government who surely want graduates to pay for their courses. Graduates know that their studies give them a higher chance of earning more and they accept, in general, they should pay for that privilege.


Presenting graduates with an impossible student loan bill will turn responsible young people into cynical tax payers or tax avoiders or goad them to achieve less in their lives.

Interesting calculations, I don't know what I think about this.


What's your proposed solution then? Would you prefer the traditional model where places are more limited and university fees for entitled wealthy kids were paid for by working class taxpayers?


The basic student loan model is simply to ensure that university fees are only paid by those who go, not by those who didn't - a not unreasonable objective.


;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...