Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why has "hte" or "teh" become more common? Simply

> because emails, internet forums, etc have become

> more commonplace. We used to think of any typed

> text as being in some way formal (some people

> still send me emails formatted as if they were

> writing a letter), but over time it has become

> less formal. Because of this, people will often

> type quickly, and "fire and forget", rather than

> carefully proof-reading and checking spelling and

> grammar. I would suggest that an email (along with

> SMS) has become possibly the least formal method

> of communiction. Also as computers, email and

> internet have invaded our lives more and more,

> people have become faster and more "ambitious" in

> their typing.

>

> Why do people mis-spell "the" more frequently than

> other words? Partly because the letters are all

> close together on the keyboard. And partly because

> it's the most common word

> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_common_words_in

> _English) so we tend to type it in "autopilot"

> mode.


Makes an awful lot of sense Jeremy, I must say.


Shame I can't find a thread from 1/2 years ago on another Forum where some older Guys(Mid-30's!) were criticising the yoof(lol) for using "teh" on a regular basis though!!

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yeah, sorry about that - I seem to have some kind

> of phobia of smilies


I have to be honest Rosie (can I leave the "H" it seems sooo formal) and admit that I'm never sure with you if you are serious/teasing/having a dig or what:)) and that may be the reason !


Thus, I'm not always sure if MY response is appropriate!


"My Living"= Profesional Gambler(Winky face).. currently betting on The Venus Williams-Australian Open Match on BBC2 right now....

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to be sure, always teasing - I don't think I'd use

> the forum to have a dig - although I might use it

> for a heated argument

>

> for the first and last time: ;-);-);-);-)


CoolB)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...