Jump to content

Dulwich based research company holding research sessions with local residents


Recommended Posts

A Dulwich-based research company - Murmur Research www.murmurresearch.com - is conducting some research on behalf of Channel 5.


We are holding 30 minute interviews in Dulwich and Camberwell, plus focus groups in central London, with viewers and non-viewers of the Channel.


The 30 minute interviews will take place from 6pm Monday 20th October in Dulwich and Camberwell. These will be with NON-VIEWERS of Channel 5. We require 18-22 and 40-50 year old males, 45-60 year old females to take part. Payment for the 30 minute session is ?30.


The focus groups will be held in Holborn on Tuesday 28th October.


Group 1 - 23-24 males and females who WATCH CHANNEL 5 and CHANNEL 5 USA, and parents of pre-school children who WATCH THE TV PROGRAMME MILKSHAKE on Channel 5. 6pm start. Duration 2 1/4 hours. Payment ?50.


Group 2 - 18-22 males and females who DON'T WATCH CHANNEL 5. 8.30pm start. Duration 2 1/4 hours. Payment ?50.


Please note - in addition to the above criteria, we require people who do regularly watch TV and the reasons for not watching Channel 5 are through choice, not because they don't watch TV generally, or can't access the channel because of signal, or any other reason.


Replies to [email protected], please feel free to forward.


Many thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...