Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southwark do seem to be particularly bad.


Not sure I like the tone of some posts which seem to suggest that you wouldn't want to buy because you might end up with some council tennants as your neighbours.


One thing you should really remember is that people don't tend to shit on their own doorsteps.


Not even *gasp* people living in council flats.

I own a flat on a nearby council estate. I used to live there, then moved and have had tenants in for the last 6 years. Mostly its been fine. I have good neighbours on my corridor, and I've had good tenants too. It was always a nice place to live when I was there.

Re council charges: When I bought the place the seller told me the council had done all the major works he could think of, so I shouldn't be bothered by further major works for a while. However, they do cyclical repairs, I think every 8 years, and that is truly a blank check as they don't know what hidden problems they will find once the scaffolding is up. And they chose the same year (roughly) to refurbish the lift and sort out the drainage problems on the estate. So it was an expensive year. To make it worse, although they bend over backwards to help owner-occupiers with their payments, private landlords are supposed to pay the full whack as the bills roll in (because as we all know landlords are all fatcat millionaires who can fish out a wadge of ?1000 notes from their back pockets whenever asked). Then again, when I called them and explained my situation they allowed me to spread the payments over a year. The normal service charge is usually not too bad. However, one year the final bill was just about double the estimate, and another year I got several hundred pounds back from them!

However, if you think about a typical scenario of an old victorian house divvied up into flats, you get a different set of problems - people arguing over what does/doesn't need to be done, nothing being done at all, people not paying their share, neighbours being a nuisance or storing their stuff in communal parts etc. So just like in a council block, you might end up lucky, or you might not.

I think my flat has been a reasonable buy, it was well affordable at the time and has risen in value along with every other property in London, though maybe less than a Victorian flat would have.

It will always have a bit of a stigma attached as it's a council block and 5 floors high, and that will always be reflected in the buying and selling price. Having said that though I have had 3 sets of tenants and only 3 days' void period in 6 years, so it can't be that bad!

I never understand why people moan about the conditions of bying a local authority flat. Most tenants using right to buy get a massive discount on the market price. Everyone knows there are service charges and potential works charges attached. That is something to be factored when deciding to buy. People are breaking their backs to only just be able to afford to buy a property. What happens when interest rates go up (as they will sooner or later), or taxes go up, duty etc? People give themselves no leeway.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure I like the tone of some posts which seem

> to suggest that you wouldn't want to buy because

> you might end up with some council tennants as

> your neighbours.


I'm kind of with you there. Surely whatever property you buy, you can't really tell who you'll end up living next to.

Sorry Otta - but i disagree with your last statement. I can't count the amount of times i've been past viewing tenants taking their dogs for a toilet break in the grounds of the DKH estate and not cleaning up after them...

Designerjooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry Otta - but i disagree with your last

> statement. I can't count the amount of times i've

> been past viewing tenants taking their dogs for a

> toilet break in the grounds of the DKH estate and

> not cleaning up after them...


And owner occupiers don't do this? Or private tenants?

Designerjooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps AJ3 - my comment certainly wasn't a slight

> on the "type" of people that live on the estate.

> It was merely an observation that i have noticed

> because it was something i would struggle with.


Then I'm struggling to see the point of your post

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I never understand why people moan about the

> conditions of bying a local authority flat. Most

> tenants using right to buy get a massive discount

> on the market price.




But most people buying ex council places are not former council tennants using the right to buy. That ship largely sailed a while back, most places are on their second third or fourth private owner, so there are no great discounts.

Maybe so Otta, but ex council flats are leasehold, come with services charges and potential maintenance costs. So you have to factor in whether you can afford that when buying. It comes back to my point that people are overextending themselves to buy property. They have to take responsibility for that. Complaining about a system, that has been in place since the right to buy scheme was dreamt up, is a red herring in my opinion.
That may be so, but it's not a solution. They are in fact helping to keep prices going up. The only way to bring prices down is for people to be realistic and not buy if they can't comfortably afford to do so. A shortage of first time buyers will being prices down. It always does.

I think if you buy leasehold on a non council block you can hopefully assume that any works are necessary and on commercial terms.


I think what some people have said here is that the works doe on local authority managed blocks are not necessarily needed and are done to utilise council budgets and also they are not necessarily apportioned equally between council tenants and private owners.


If either of these things were true I'd avoid buying ex council.

OP, there is a law in place from 2015 which prohibits extornate service charges. Dont get me wrong they are still jot cheap but I think the cap is ?5k per 3yrs or something. Will check facts and come back to you.


our property had major works this year. Although not an estate but street property and I believe it will cost us quite abit but we have been able to budget accordingly.

I have lived in a leasehold flat for 9years nw and it is not all bad. Huge improvements in the last few years. It does, on occasion take alot of effort to get your voice heard if you have issues with standard of work or accuracy of bills but you can get issues resolved.


if you do go for it, team up with LAS and other organisations. Without their help I would have been lost in the david and goliath process at times.


i just wanted to say it is not all bad.

AJ3 - the point was that people DO sh*t on their own doorsteps. I made the comment because i would find it very difficult living on the ground floor of a communal block where one of my neighbours decided to allow their dog to defecate outside my open windows every single day and not clean up after themselves. I was merely highlighting some of the possible difficulties that come from living in a communal block. Perhaps if you removed the chip off your shoulder you would have seen that.

Designerjooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AJ3 - the point was that people DO sh*t on their

> own doorsteps. I made the comment because i would

> find it very difficult living on the ground floor

> of a communal block where one of my neighbours

> decided to allow their dog to defecate outside my

> open windows every single day and not clean up

> after themselves. I was merely highlighting some

> of the possible difficulties that come from living

> in a communal block. Perhaps if you removed the

> chip off your shoulder you would have seen that.


Yes people do and they do it in private blocks and social ones. There's no social distinction between arseholes


Oh and less of the 'chip on the shoulder' shit butt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...