Jump to content

Pilates with Baby and Zumbini January 2015


zairalo

Recommended Posts

New courses starting in January 2015

All classes are run in a 6 week format


PILATES WITH BABY:


This class is suitable for mothers from six weeks after delivery, 10 weeks after a cesarean section. It is a friendly class that will help you recover your body after pregnancy and birth, calm your mind and get to know other mothers with similar age babies.


Thursdays 2pm from 8th January: Pilates at James Wilson, Tulse Hill, 357 Norwood Road, SE27 9BQ

Fridays 10:30 from 9th January: Pilates at Phoenix Centre, Crystal Palace, 66 Westow Street, SE19 3AF


ZUMBINI


This is a really special and fun class for the baby/toddler and for the adults as well. A 45 min movement and music experience suitable for children ages 0 to 3.5 Class is fun, energetic, and full of contemporary music with world beats. It is child appropriate, grown-up friendly, and full of fun ?Zumba? flavor.Children wiggle, dance, sing, and move using their bodies, rhythmic instruments, and scarves, to encourage, develop and enhance their natural rhythm and musicality.


Tuesdays 11:15 from 6th January: Zumbini at James Wilson, Tulse Hill, 357 Norwood Road, SE27 9BQ



All classes have limited space, 8 places for Pilates and 10 places for Zumbini so try and book your space as soon as possible.


JANUARY 2015 SPECIAL OFFER!!!

1 course (Pilates or Zumbini): ?42

2 courses (Pilates and Zumbini): ?78


Interested? Get in touch via email at [email protected] or phone 07578469955.


Zaira Lopez zairalopez.zumba.com

The Pilates with baby course on Thursday at 2pm is now fully booked. I have added another 6 weeks class on Thursdays at 11:15. There is still 5 spaces left in that class starting on 8th January.


There are still 3 spaces in the Zumbini course. If you are interested in either Pilates with baby on Thursdays 11:15 or Zumbini on Tuesdays 11:00 get in touch soon via email at [email protected] or by phoning 07578469955 and reserve your place.


Clases take place at James Wilson Coffee Shop, Tulse Hill, 357 Norwood road, SE27 9BQ.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...