Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure what either of you guys are referring to? I was observing that the best strategy for avoiding payment was Chick's rather than Huntaaar. I was also criticising the warden's behaviour.


Quids, I agree that the LA want your money (although I disagree with your attributed motivation) and for that reason Chick's approach is going to be more effective.


Jeremy I agree with you, and for that reason Chick's approach is going to be more effective.


(As it happens Quids I can't agree with you that parking management is about revenue generation, as according to Southwark's figures the 8.9m cost of maintaining and running traffic & parking management schemes far outstrips the 1.1m in revenue they generate. QED they ain't about money, but about punishing selfish drivers who abuse both their neighbours and their environment).

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> according to Southwark's figures the 8.9m cost of

> maintaining and running traffic & parking

> management schemes far outstrips the 1.1m in

> revenue they generate.


Where is the source of this info? Sounds highly dubious that the cost of issuing and processing a ticket would be that much (8 x ?60 = ?480). It certainly shouldn't be the case...

The 8.9m is for "traffic transport and parking" which surely covers much more than just traffic and parking enforcement! This doesn't really give us an indication as to the costs of traffic and parking management alone. I don't really have the time to search for evidence, but I am far from convinced.


I'm not amongst those who believe that parking tickets are a "cash cow", but I do believe that the commission-based systems in use results in unfair or unjustified tickets. And even if the council don't profit from it, others clearly do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have used Adam for many years. I have cut and blow dry for £23. Lowlights twice a year - I think I paid around £45 for this.  A friend went to an ED hairdressers and was charged £40 for a trim only with no wash.
    • Strong views?  I thought this was The Lounge so anyone could bring something up?  This is an important part of our day to day life and the Labour Party isn’t doing what they promised since their election nearly a year and a half ago.   
    • OMG,  Greene King.  How awful.  Music may be fine.
    • Baffled by this. We've adopted our last three cats from Celia Hammond and all three have been outdoor cats (which we were upfront about). And when we got our first cat we were out working every day. And of course we live on a road, with through traffic - who doesn't, in London? Maybe we were just lucky but none of those things were deemed an issue when we applied for adoption - in fact we found the RSPCA much stricter when we tried to register with them first time round. Not saying this wasn't your experience, hellosailor, but it certainly wasn't ours - so I wouldn't want this post to put other people off contacting Celia Hammond to ask about adoption. They are a brilliant little charity and I will be supporting this appeal as I have done other appeals of theirs in the past.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...