Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Stupid question I know, but if I remove the tongue and groove panelling and the laths it's nailed onto from my understairs cupboard, the stairs won't fall down, will they?


I want to store stuff under there temporarily but still be able to get at it without having to take everything else out first, and the cupboard is being rebuilt at some point anyway.


Not being an engineer - and my school physics teacher having omitted to teach me any mechanics because "girls don't like mechanics" (thanks Mrs Garnett, it was a compulsory section of the A level paper :)) ) I have no idea what may be holding the stairs up apart from a few flimsy bits of wood :))

I'd expect it not to be T&G or panelling which holds up the staircase.

It's usually the stringer - the diagonal timber, resting on a cross beam at the landing level or a timber upright which may form the main bannister pole on floor / landing above.

Get at it with a lump hammer, Sue.. What's the worst that can happen EH?


I don't think anyone will give you an 'absolute guarantee' without seeing it in person - to rule out anything weird or wacky - but at KK says, it's usually a stringer, not cupboards underneath.


Take a couple of panels out, expose the bottom of the staircase to have a look with a torch and you'll most likely see exactly that.


Then have at it with a lump hammer.

There'll be a LOAD of dust under there so although bashing away with a big hammer is fun, in the end you'll be cleaning-up more than really necessary. Alternatively you could use a crow / nail bar, claw hammer, saw and maybe drill to work your way in. If you're able to save the panelling to a large extent you may be able to re-use part of if for doors to the storage space you create.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Get at it with a lump hammer, Sue.. What's the

> worst that can happen EH?

>


The whole house collapses, taking with it me, my sister and her parrot (both currently staying), and then the whole terrace collapses on both sides of it like dominoes :))


Then my insurance company won't pay up for any of it :)) though I suppose that probably wouldn't be my problem as I'd be buried under a pile of rubble :))


OK more stupidity. How can something on the floor above hold up stairs going from that floor to the bottom floor?

The single flight of stairs is a self-supporting structure. The landing carries the load, it's supported on 3 sides by walls. The single flight of stairs is fixed to the landing, flank wall, and the floor. Imagine leaning a simple ladder, as long as it's fixed at the top and bottom to prevent it from slipping, you could walk up that too...

The stair string is the main structural timber in the construction of your staircase. The stairs will sit on your ground floor and lean against what's known as a trimmer joist within the structure of your first floor. You will also find if there is a stair string along a wall, the string will be bolted/nailed to the wall.


Back in them thar olden days the stairs were made with materials that are a little lighter than most used today which means that although the additional support of a stud wall underneath the stairs shouldn't by rights be required given the age of the stairs and its section sizes, it may be best not to take the stud wall the panelling is attached to away entirely. Maybe leave a support in place half way along the string to be on the safe side.

Thanks all. I'll try to attach some rather poor pics of the inside of the cupboard.


So you reckon if I remove not just the T&G but also all the wooden strutty things it's nailed on to, the stairs will not fall down, as they're miraculously held up by stuff above them ??


Oh **** I've had to make them all smaller :( Hope they're now big enough to see ....


One is very blurry but life is too short .... I expect you get the gist ....


ETA: More bad words, I've cleverly repeated one and omitted another, oh well, senility proceeds apace ....

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looks like you've already got access to

> understairs for storage ?

> Or you just want access from the side ?



I have a door at one end.


Whenever I want to retrieve anything from the other end, I have to take everything out.


When my kitchen is done (and whilst it's being done) I have a small freezer which I intend to keep under the stairs, however I also need access to stuff beyond it, plus access to my coal hole via an existing trap door, as the stopcock is down there (ooh missus).


I'm going to (hopefully!) remove all the T&G and battens so that I can put the freezer there plus a load of kitchen stuff while the new kitchen is in progress, then when the kitchen is complete I'm going to have the cupboard fitted out with shelves etc for storage, plus several T&G doors for easy access, rather than just one as at present.


Does that make sense?!


I wanted to remove the T&G now so that I could start putting stuff there before the builders started ....

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would suggest that the film has a higher place

> in public consciousness than it really deserves...


Come on Jez, it was a great film


In fact i'm going to re-watch it sometime soon



Keep us posted on "Stair Watch" Sue


You could always take the whole 'staircase/deathslide' thing out and turn downstairs into a bungalow, and the (no longer) upstairs into a loft. Then apply for planning and turn the "loft" into an upstairs, thus adding more space to your newly converted bungalow


I'm happy to discuss this idea further Sue. I'm all about thinking-outside-the-box type solutions me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...