Jump to content

PROTECTING PECKHAM?S ROOFTOP VIEW: Presenting the petition Sat 7 Feb 3pm


Recommended Posts

Presenting the petition is the next stage in the campaign to protect Peckham's view from the rooftops on the Bussey building and the cinema/multi-storey car park building, while the future uses of the car park building are being examined.


Can you spare an hour on Saturday afternoon to support the deputation? We need as many supporters as possible to help ward councillors see the significance of this issue. This is about the need to have an integrated view to planning key aspects of the town centre. They do sometimes listen if they know enough local people are seriously taking a watchful interest.


Please come to support the petition presentation at the

Peckham & Nunhead Community Council on

SATURDAY 7th February at 3.00pm, in the Damilola Taylor Centre,

1 East Surrey Grove, off Commercial Way, near Southampton Way.


Please sign & share the link to the petition: https://www.change.org/p/protect-peckham-s-rooftop-view


SOME BACKGROUND


* Rooftops view campaign: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Multi-Storey_Car_Park#August_2014_Campaign_to_protect_Peckham.27s_rooftop_views

* Why it is not a NO campaign: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1391612,1404563#msg-1404563

* Cinema / multi storey car park future: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Multi-Storey_Car_Park#Planning_status_of_the_cinema.2Fmulti-storey_car_park

The petition to protect Peckham?s Rooftop View will be presented by the deputation tomorrow SATURDAY 7th February 3pm. Please come to support. It is really important to show the Council the extent of local concern. The Peckham & Nunhead Community Council is meeting in the Damilola Taylor Centre, 1 East Surrey Grove, off Commercial Way, near the junction with Southampton Way.


There will also be another important item now on the agenda ? they will be announcing the architects appointed for the next stage of the Peckham Rye Station CoDesign developments. This is a good opportunity to ask questions or make comments if you have any about the CoDesign process and what is going to be happening next.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...