Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are there any leaseholders from Dylways on this forum? Specifically leaseholders from street properties on Dylways? As some of you may be aware, major works were carried out last year to these properties involving minimal roof repairs, very superficial brick refacing and unnecessary guttering replacement. Each leaseholder on my block has been charged roughly ?8200 and the total for our block of four is ?32800. Has anyone challenged this charge or had any positive response from the Home Ownership Unit?


These works seem very overpriced compared to the window replacement carried out in 2006. Furthermore, the Home Ownership Unit have stated that they believe the ?7000 charged for scaffolding is accurate and will not not drop on final account. Has anyone else challenged this?

It's all extortionate to be honest but the work they have carried out is so minimal that I can't see how they can justify the costs. They quoted ?4500 to apply water proof masonry cream. When I researched the cost of the product and area coverage per 10L the cost for this was revised to ?350 but the overall estimate figure remained the same, as the difference in amount was moved to a different category - "general brickwork repairs."


Is there no way to report the Home Ownership Unit to an external auditor? I think there are huge discrepancies in their figures and this has been my experience over the last eleven years. Yes, I too regret purchasing an ex-council property.

You can apply to the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (previously the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal) for a determination as the your liability for, and reasonableness of, service charges:


More info here:


http://www.lease-advice.org/publications/documents/?doctype=6

Unfortunately this has already gone to the First-Tier Tribunal and they ruled in favour of Southwark Council. I am in the process of appealing. Despite numerous lies from the contractor and poor quality brick repairs, which the tribunal panel acknowledged on inspection, the estimate was deemed reasonable. The only course of action I have now is to appeal or apply once again on final account. Southwark Home Ownership Unit is getting away with legalised extortion. Does anyone have links to the media/press, as this problem needs to be highlighted. Something is very wrong and no one seems to care.

Back in July 2013 Channel 4 did a programme called Undercover Boss which featured the Chief Executive of Southwark Eleanor Kelly who went undercover to sort out Southwarks problems. Bit contrived in all departments.


Ask them to make a return visit/programme

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...