Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are there any leaseholders from Dylways on this forum? Specifically leaseholders from street properties on Dylways? As some of you may be aware, major works were carried out last year to these properties involving minimal roof repairs, very superficial brick refacing and unnecessary guttering replacement. Each leaseholder on my block has been charged roughly ?8200 and the total for our block of four is ?32800. Has anyone challenged this charge or had any positive response from the Home Ownership Unit?


These works seem very overpriced compared to the window replacement carried out in 2006. Furthermore, the Home Ownership Unit have stated that they believe the ?7000 charged for scaffolding is accurate and will not not drop on final account. Has anyone else challenged this?

It's all extortionate to be honest but the work they have carried out is so minimal that I can't see how they can justify the costs. They quoted ?4500 to apply water proof masonry cream. When I researched the cost of the product and area coverage per 10L the cost for this was revised to ?350 but the overall estimate figure remained the same, as the difference in amount was moved to a different category - "general brickwork repairs."


Is there no way to report the Home Ownership Unit to an external auditor? I think there are huge discrepancies in their figures and this has been my experience over the last eleven years. Yes, I too regret purchasing an ex-council property.

You can apply to the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (previously the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal) for a determination as the your liability for, and reasonableness of, service charges:


More info here:


http://www.lease-advice.org/publications/documents/?doctype=6

Unfortunately this has already gone to the First-Tier Tribunal and they ruled in favour of Southwark Council. I am in the process of appealing. Despite numerous lies from the contractor and poor quality brick repairs, which the tribunal panel acknowledged on inspection, the estimate was deemed reasonable. The only course of action I have now is to appeal or apply once again on final account. Southwark Home Ownership Unit is getting away with legalised extortion. Does anyone have links to the media/press, as this problem needs to be highlighted. Something is very wrong and no one seems to care.

Back in July 2013 Channel 4 did a programme called Undercover Boss which featured the Chief Executive of Southwark Eleanor Kelly who went undercover to sort out Southwarks problems. Bit contrived in all departments.


Ask them to make a return visit/programme

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...