Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This event Liberty Event passed under my radar, otherwise I would be there protesting at Government plans to extend further the surveillance society.


The current Communications Data Bill, being promoted by Jaqui Smith, could create a database of e-mails and telephone messages between us all. Jaqui Smith has said that a more efficient means of storing data such as the timing and location of phone calls made by terror suspects would avoid more wide-scale surveillance of the public. She argues it will help prevent terrorism and murders such as Soham and that intecepting 'chatter between potential terrorists' - in other words you and me - is 'vital for national security.'


Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, says: 'The thing we have to worry about is what happens next, because the government is already mooting plans to create a central government database where they hold all the information.'


We must oppose this bill - I would recommend lobbying our MPs - but Tessa J and Harriet Harperson are unlikely to oppose the government line.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5484-liberty-events/
Share on other sites

The only thing I can't rationalise is that the public seems quite happy to hand over all of it's data to non-democratic commercial organisations without batting an eyelid.


The big search engines and email companies routinely examine and share data such as search habits and email content for advertising purposes, and to influence your behaviour online. I don't see anyone dropping Google, Yahoo! or Facebook to protest this?


Major stores routinely match our shopping habits with our personal profiles and credit ratings to send us direct mail promoting various goods and services, but I don't see anyone boycotting Tesco or their Clubcard in protest.


The Oystercard even records our journeys and our destinations with our age and gender.


If people were as worried about fascist dictatorships as all that, then why don't they see these non-demoncratic organisations as a greater threat?


Incidentally, Ben Goldacre does a great job here about demonstrating why mass email content modelling is a mathematically pointless exercise.

After I've bigged up Ben Goldacre's book 'Bad Science' can I say that while on the face of it this may seem to be our governments over zealous attempt to '1984' our asses it is, as Huguenot says, something commercial organizations do routinely. Any information gathered is bound to be lost or accidently wiped, and anything pertaining to terrorism will pass under their noses or over their heads. What needs to be held to account is the continuing incompetence of our civil service and in recent years the calibre of our civil servants.

Ben Goldacre's illustration is good and demonstrates the Government's illogicality. On the subject of commercial organisations holding our data - two points:


1. We voluntarily give them access - it is a choice and we can, if we wish, choose to avoid.


2. They are, in general, looking at mass, rather than individual, data - how many SE22 residents shop in Sainsbury's and buy Macleans toothpaste every month. They are not linking it to my flight from Damascus, my flickr photos from Istanbul and my telephone conversations with business colleagues in Kuwait to make connections that aren't there.


It should not be necessary to intrude on law abiding individuals. I like the idea that, if I choose, I could pay cash for everything, rent a property under an assumed name, use internet cafes, have no car or driving licence, no TV or TV licence and no passport - and thus live a life unfettered by Government intrusion. As every day passes we are more likely to have to prove our existence and identification to Government just to live our lives. I think this is fundamentally wrong.

Not sure what you mean by regulate Brendan - that's exactly what a law and order system does: regulate between social, antisocial, and morally inappropriate behaviour


Privacy issues are about how far they can go to do this and what the cost/benefit curve looks like (cost can be calculated in moral as well as financial currencies).


MM, I can see what you mean by voluntary disclosure - it means that people who do sign up consider they get more in reward for signing up to these services than they feel they pay in disclosure.


I wouldn't get too comfortable about how discrete your internet usage behaviour is when you're online: the 'disclosure' element is poorly understood.


For example Yahoo! actually own Flickr, and the data from this is pooled. Yahoo! also own a company called Right Media, which supports advertising across 2,000 or more individual websites, and the data on these is also pooled.


Google own Blogger (the world's largest blog site), Youtube, GMail and Picasa photo site. That's around 20% of online activity. They also own Doubleclick, which provides data collection across a million plus websites every month. The data from that is also pooled.


With things like Streetview, Google are also taking photos of your house and putting them online along with the address. Here you don't even have an opt-in. They're just doing it.


That's commercial organisations for you.


Perhaps the ID card for example should be sold as a solution for the 800 million quid stolen from our tax fund every year by benefit fraud. That seems more appealing than 20 clubcard points.

Hugenot - don't start me on ID cards. A financial and database disaster waiting to happen. It would be the lynchpin that ties all the other government databases together to one unique identified.


Fortunately it's probably a cost too far given how much money this government has committed tax payers too already.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...