Jump to content

Holiday painting for children, 7 - 10 yrs, 2 - 3pm, 7th - 10th April


Recommended Posts

"Process not Product":

Point Zero Intuitive Painting for Children, 7 - 10 years


2 - 3pm, Tuesday 7th - Friday 10th April, 2015

?40 for course of 4 x 1 hour sessions


Point Zero is a process of intuitive painting which fosters self confidence and joyous creativity in children. It also brings healing by helping them integrate and process their experiences.


Children are natural intuitive painters until the judgement of adults causes them to step away from their own felt experience in order to paint products for the approval of others. They then grow up not trusting their own spontaneity, and believing they are not creative.


Intuitive painting will happen again naturally if we allow children to enter the creative process for their own curiosity and delight, rather than for products which we judge in terms of success and failure.


To register, or if you have any questions, please contact:


Helena 07947 104 135 or [email protected]

Painting Your Pathway

88 Grove Park

SE5 8LE


www.paintingyourpathway.co.uk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...