Jump to content

Ricardo Charles, structural engineer, Nunhead.


Recommended Posts

BEWARE- DO NOT USE-

I wanted to write a warning about the 'service' Ricardo Charles, a structural engineer in Nunhead provided for our extension project. I would heavily not recommend his service!

He was contracted to provide all information for the building control application of our domestic extension. We signed the contract, he 'completed' the calculations and we made the payment. The drawings and calculations he provided after payment were inaccurate (he hadn't spend the time to look properly at the planning drawings provided) and incomplete (he hadn't bothered to do any calculations regarding the roof structure).

He has solely been the worse appointment and worst 'service' I have ever had the unfortunate misfortune to work with.

when our architect tried to question him about the wrong calculations and drawings he refused to co-operate and did not answer any questions about his mistakes stating he had already completed his contract.

Worse still he tried to hold us to ransom asking for a further ?1000 to answer the questions about his mistakes!!

Unfortunately we had already paid him the initial payment. He cost our project ?1000 and also 2 months of precious time with delays and difficulties.

We have now had to appointment another structural engineer to correct and complete what he was supposed to provide.

He is supposed to be a professional person with industry experience and should have been more clear in his quote and have been more honest and professional. He deliberately and deviously conned us out of our money and time with no intention to complete the job. Worse still he tried to hold us to ransom to answer questions about his incomplete and inaccurate work.

Please beware - do not use Ricardo Charles!

  • 2 months later...

Fabrication & Lies

In response to the above message the facts of this clients interaction with my practice are these:

Having provided a quotation for the structural design work to her extension she responded several weeks later asking if we could undertake the work for half of the original quotation.

When we eventually agreed on a price she took three weeks to pay the deposit by cheque.

We were given a set of architectural planning drawings to work with and produced a design based on these drawings.

On completion of the work we requested the balance of the payment.

At this point she introduced her architect who produced another set of drawings and list of requirements

I explained that my appointment was with her and not her architect and that as that his involvement was not part of our contract and that we would not be responding to her architects requirements

She then took four weeks to pay the balance of the fee simply to get the drawings and calculations.

At this point she wrote in conjunction with her architect a vitriolic list of requirements and threatened to discredit me and my practice for her incompetence.

Clearly this client did not seek advice as to best practice and blames my practice for her own failings.

Her name is Laura Dodd (Be Careful)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...