Jump to content

New cinema


cella

Recommended Posts

I remember going to the Cinema in the 50's..

Films were screened continuously and we rarely watched the a film from start to finish.


Often when we went in the film might be half way through, so we would watch the film to the end then

watch the beginning until we reached the bit where we first came in. Seems ridiculous now.


Then Cinemas started to have start times and a program with a second film and then the

trailers for the following week.


The same film would be shown for the whole week.


There was only one screen and the Cinemas were huge holding many hundred people.

Ice cream was sold in the interval when reels were being changed. Hot dogs were available and smoking

was allowed. Many gentle men smoked pipes.

There was always a thick blue haze and you could see the beam of the projectors in the smoke.


So with 3 screens I don't know how often films will be changed.

Can't imagine the same film being on for the whole week.


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/56382-new-cinema/#findComment-836892
Share on other sites

It will operate in exactly the same way as all other cinemas with several films all showing at different rimes of the day and evening and usually running for a fortnight. They will have probably cut out the man sitting at his organ rising from the orchestra pit and and the White tennis ball jumping along the words to the music but we are in austere times!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/56382-new-cinema/#findComment-836918
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...