Jump to content

230th Anniversary of Belair House 10th May, 12pm?5pm


Recommended Posts

Celebrating the 230th anniversary of Belair House, we invite all to explore this pivotal and stunning venue and discover its rich history. Looking back to its establishment in 1785, we will be recreating stories in a truly special ?Through the Times? exhibition across the second floor.


Following the success of last year?s showing and with such warming accounts from guests, we encourage you to share your stories and personal accounts of your time at Belair House.


Complimentary Prosecco will be served for early arrivals on the opening day 10th May, 12pm?5pm. The exhibition will be open to view throughout the week till the 14th May for guests who may not be able to attend the opening day.


We look forward to seeing as many Dulwich locals as possible, as we share our findings of our much-loved venue. Please RSVP or share you stories via: [email protected]


www.belairhouse.co.uk / 020 8299 9788

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...