Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst standing orders and direct debits get claimed at midnight, the start of the day they're due to leave my account, I can't make transfers into that account until the staff turn up at the bank and pick up a phone.


If a bank can set up it's system to claim money at midnight I'd wager it would be just as easy for it to do so at lunchtime when customers would have had time to transfer money into the account.


And before anyone points out the obvious, I can be a bit forgetful but I shouldn't have to give money to a bank because of that.


Grrrr etc

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5823-the-thing-about-bank-charges/
Share on other sites

AnotherPaul - I have discovered the ins and outs of this since freelancing and having erratic payers* - not sure what bank you're with but mine is fine provided:


1) money goes in on the day

2) if it's something that they would "return unpaid" rather than just pay and take you over overdraft limit (not sure if there's always an apparent logic to that one, but direct debits and standing orders etc) you call and let them know that you're paying the money in. That avoids the problem of their having returned an item unpaid at 9am only for you to pay in enough funds to cover at 11


*and erm, sometimes just being completely rubbish

Interesting Mick that I decided to use Public Transport to and from Millwall tonight.


Guy I was chatting with worked for a Law Firm and was very moderate yet seemed to relish the potential events to morrow as he feels The Banks have shafted us for a long period and he reckons its pay-back time tomorrow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...