Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Unfortunately you don't have any such 'right' in the eyes of the law. So if you are protesting you can certainly expect the police to do all in their power to bring the streets back to a state of order.


as for inprisonment(sic) without due process, give me a break. You chose to take part in an unlawful gathering and so the police acted within their rights in this instance."


fuck me, Franco would have loved you.

If you are a protester then you should be allowed to do this freely and without interference from the Police. If you are a rioter or are seen to be trying to incite a riot then you can and should expect the Police to use physical force to deal with you.
If you are a protester then you should be allowed to do this freely and without interference from the Police. If you are a rioter or are seen to be trying to incite a riot then you can and should expect the Police to use physical force to deal with you.

"as for inprisonment(sic)(sic) without due process, give me a break"


Treble take.

You're proposing that due process be scrapped?


Well, you've a point, due process is for namby-pamby bleeding heart liberals after all. The police have proved that they never make make mistakes, or ever have anything but the most scrupulous intentions, so who needs courts for goodness sake. We'll soon put a stop to these trustafarian types, and remember if you do nothing wrong you have nothing to fear!

"as for inprisonment(sic)(sic) without due process, give me a break"


Treble take.

You're proposing that due process be scrapped?


Well, you've a point, due process is for namby-pamby bleeding heart liberals after all. The police have proved that they never make make mistakes, or ever have anything but the most scrupulous intentions, so who needs courts for goodness sake. We'll soon put a stop to these trustafarian types, and remember if you do nothing wrong you have nothing to fear!

Due process means that the government respect the legal rights that are owed to an individual. In this country a person has a legal right to protest. A person doesn't have a legal right to riot. The Police are within their rights to make a clear distinction between what is a protest and what is a riot and to act accordingly.
Due process means that the government respect the legal rights that are owed to an individual. In this country a person has a legal right to protest. A person doesn't have a legal right to riot. The Police are within their rights to make a clear distinction between what is a protest and what is a riot and to act accordingly.

Wrong place , wrong time , take the hit , shut ya gob.


if you want to be a front line protester , be prepared to be on the receiving end ( not always from the police).


I wanted to take some visitors to london around the city on that day , we had to change plans , that pi**ed me off , do the protester give a toss about me and my rights to walk around the city ... I dont think so... so I say F**K em.

batter them into submission and let the silent majority get on with their lives.

Wrong place , wrong time , take the hit , shut ya gob.


if you want to be a front line protester , be prepared to be on the receiving end ( not always from the police).


I wanted to take some visitors to london around the city on that day , we had to change plans , that pi**ed me off , do the protester give a toss about me and my rights to walk around the city ... I dont think so... so I say F**K em.

batter them into submission and let the silent majority get on with their lives.

Big Phil whilst I have sympathy to your predicament on that day, I still think in this country people have a right to protest even if this causes a minor inconvinience to the general public. If the results of the protest are to the benefit of the silent majority then the protestors should be applauded.
Big Phil whilst I have sympathy to your predicament on that day, I still think in this country people have a right to protest even if this causes a minor inconvinience to the general public. If the results of the protest are to the benefit of the silent majority then the protestors should be applauded.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Unfortunately you don't have any such 'right' in

> the eyes of the law. So if you are protesting you

> can certainly expect the police to do all in their

> power to bring the streets back to a state of

> order.

>

> as for inprisonment(sic) without due process, give

> me a break. You chose to take part in an unlawful

> gathering and so the police acted within their

> rights in this instance."

>

> @#$%& me, Franco would have loved you.


Ah yes, Mockney, I too recall when more than two people together were deemed to be an illegal demonstration (there were no legal ones). And when when over a hundred people were shot by police with machine guns inside the cathedral in Vitoria for the sin of holding meeting about a strike. And that in 1976, after Franco had died and Spain was a 'democracy'.

In 1976 Spain wasn't even remotely a democracy, it was still entirely under the old regime, though nominally a monarchy at that time.


The transition to democracy (la transici?n) occurred between 1977 when negotiations for the new constitution began (adopted '78) and 1982 when it finally became a fully fledged democracy under the formerly banned PSOE.


This was a tricky period that needed clever and sensitive handling thanks to the likes of statesmen like Juan Carlos and Suarez. The ingredients at the time weren't dissimilar to those after the death of Tito and a renewal of war was a very real possibility.


I was even in Madrid in 1981 during the rather pathetic attempt at a coup by Tejero in the congress.


So I'm a bit lost as to your point. Franco was a good guy or Spain is innately wicked?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...