Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Proctor and Gamble Incident


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/illuminati14_16.jpg



It has been widely disputed that proctor&gamble are funding the church of satan. I am going to provide a hypothesis on the whole thing. it started when the president of P&G went on a television show and claimed that he was a satanist and that the logo of P&G was a satanic symbol and the company would fund the church of satan. the host asked that this stament would hurt buisness because of a christian boycott. he reply with "There are not enough cristians in the united states to make a diffence." this is been widly disproven because records show that the president was never on said television show and the public records of the companys finances showed no such funding.


That was how it all started. the procter and gamble company changed their logo and said that those quotes were never said. i personally think that they changed alot and disproved to many things to not be hiding something. the logo shows three sixes and the face of satan if colored correctly. the company never saw a major problem with the christian church because the episode and such were never shown again and the finance records were tampered with. this was all done with the help of one group, the Illuminati.


BEWARE SATANIC CLEANING PRODUCTS

Fascinated by all alternative theories in a quasi-academic sort of way Mike - used to go to the Fortean Times UnConvention many years ago before it all went mainstream - best moment there was the late Ken Campbell who finished his lecture with a nubile young lady who secreted milk in a certain part of her anatomy and squirted the front row - astonishing and apropos of nothing.


BTW help is hand with Orgone Balsters ..

Orgone Blasting - defeat aliens

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW David Icke has fingered David Aaronovitch as a

> "high-order reptilian"

>

>

> http://hardtruth.navhost.com/images/reptilian01.jp

> g


Diana (Jane Bader) was a high order Reptilian and still is high order!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...