Jump to content

Recommended Posts

OK, that worked. Before I have my starter for ten, just thining a little more since I first intended to start this post.


Thing that is probably hacking me off is that the BBC can only give praise. Now part of the fun in listening to Alan Green commentating on Five Live is when it is a dire match. Clearly no eqivalent on BBC's festival coverage.

Still having problems in posting my original intro, so this is abbeviated.


This is purely for fun. Please use other threat for proper debate.


No 1 hate is 'Glasto' (see other thread that beat me to it). Jo Wiley must have been told, as she isn't using it.


No 2 is Chris Evans, who seems to have mutated to a Clarkson type person, and was just totally OTT when broadcsting yesaterday morning.


No 3 was a little earlier - saying how amazing Michael Clark was, and that you never saw this sort of thing. Where have you been hiding for the last 30 years?




Repeat, this is just a bit of fun.

Thread is some amsuing comments on the BBC commentary. Simple n'est pas? I've got over the "terrible, corporate guff. It's soul" Phase. Even though I fully agree with this!


So back to the BBC. The only thing I can add from today's casual listening is the insistence of stating Glastonbury Festival in every sentence.


Yes, pretty clear that you have blanket coverage on the radio. So it is obvious what you are talking about. I suppose if you pay a load of dosh you have to get your money's worth, but appears to be a reverse of where the HAVE to recognise the sponsor.


Perhaps they should say, the Glastonbury Festival of Perfoming Arts, formerly raising money for CND (for you corporate warmongers out there, with no soul) and now (I haven't checked) for Greenpeace - you corporate polluters out there, with no soul.


But I am digressing. Surely someone has something amusing to add.


Oh, I do have something to add. I have zero interest in Kanu West,now he has quite football. Obviously BBC have. So half the discussion today seems to have been "he forgot his words at the Glastonbury Festival, and was out of pitch at the Glastonbury Festival". "Wow, what a Glastonbury Festival rock and roller eh? At the Glastonbury Festival" "That is what makes the Glastonbury Festival so special". "Lets ask these Glastonbury Festival goers, what they think of Kanu's great performance as the Glstonbury Festival headliner on Saturday night at the Glastonbury Festival"


PS conversely thought Jay Z was a good headliner, so not simply having a pop at the genre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...