Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The End of the Line is a powerful film about one of the world's most disturbing problems - over-fishing. Advances in fishing technology mean whole species of wild fish are under threat and the most important stocks we eat are predicted to be in a state of collapse by 2050. The film points the finger at those most to blame, including celebrity chefs, and shows what we can do about it. This is not just a film, it is also a campaign - for sustainable consumption of fish, for marine protected areas to allow the sea to recover, and for a new ethic of responsible fishing"

Recommended

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6699-the-end-of-the-line/
Share on other sites

The history of the fish industry is working class anarchy in action - and also the cause of its demise.


It would be ridiculous to blame the consumer or celebrity chefs for increasing demand, it was the responsibility of the industry to recognise decreasing supply and organise, legislate and price to respond to the the crisis.


It's one of the clearest demonstrations of how the 'market' cannot be used to regulate all the actions of a society. A 'market' only works where the consequence of certain activity (feedback) is local, transparent and within an actionable timescale.


Like private car enthusiasms and rampant consumerism, the fishing industry was blind to the immediate impact of its actions, blaming shrinking catches on unlucky weeks, bloody foreigners and onerous quotas.


It was in reality a crisis created by small-mindedness, selfishness and wilful negligence.


I hope we can learn a lesson.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't access the article - what's the gist?  I took the markets getting jittery when she was crying at PMQs to be a sign that they trusted her. But maybe it was because they were simply worried about any form of instability.  The NIC hikes have stymied the economy, which we could all see a mile off. Will a wealth tax improve things? Does anyone here think the trickle down has any impact and that chasing out the super rich will help things? Or are we just seeing off the biggest contributors to the economy? And has the Kwasi approach ever worked anywhere else?  Economics is not my strong point at all, I'd love to know others' opinions, but it seems to be she has few options, especially as the party is so divided. 
    • does either of them have a surgery? probably not over summer, but I thought they had to give the opportunity for their constituents to meet them.
    • MaryT, I’ve contacted the Dulwich Hill councillors several times in recent years, always copying them both in. I have never had an acknowledgment from Jon Hartley (not even an automated response or out-of-office) nor had any response or engagement from him regarding the issue raised.   On each occasion, only Maggie Browning responded (she uses an out-of-office if she is away). The last time, I received no response from either for 3 months, until Maggie Browning emailed me to apologise for not responding and asking if the problem had been resolved.
    • The  Kwasi effect is being considered. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...