Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am very concerned about moves to attempt to further en-forest what has traditionally been meadowland in Camberwell Old Cemetery.


OK ? I know this is a wind-up ? but not entirely so. Those who walk in the cemetery will have noted that quite a large portion of the currently-in-use area at the south (ish) end has been left un-cut so creating a hay meadow. With the addition of some wild flower seeds (such as are growing currently in the bed in the Horniman gardens) this would re-create the traditional meadowland (with all the benefits to wild-life, bees and butterflies etc.) that were probably its pre-cemetery origins in the meadowland/ pastureland originally bought from a farmer when the cemetery was first created.


This is (in wild-life and ?nature? terms) a far more productive use for the land than the scrub-growth which is proposed for clearance. And is more true to the ?original? land use pre-cemetery.


It would also be wholly consistent with its continued use for burials ? hay meadows are traditionally cut-back in late summer ? but can be allowed to grow back up the following year. Thus the objectives of both nature lovers and those who wish the area to continue to be of service to the relics of Southwark residents can be met.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/67027-southwark-meadows-day/
Share on other sites

The council's plan is for meadow areas to be reused for burials as well after the wooded areas are used - much like the area on wood vale. The council have been asked for natural meadow burials in the meadow areas to preserve them but they have refused so far. The meadow areas you like will be gone to.


Have you actually walked arround the areas to be developed penguin? There is a oak with of a girth of 4ms in there. That would mean the tree predates the cemetery and be close to the enclosure act date. The old native oaks are repopulating the area so the there are lots of young oak saplings in the area. There are younger native shrub plants hawthorn, elder growing in between the larger trees a "scrub" as call it but these are very important to wildlife and beautiful imo.


So yes let's save the meadows.

Trees have always formed part of the 'furniture' of cemeteries (yew, very traditionally) and I have no doubts that the oak you refer to was either an initial cemetery planting or may even date back to an original hedgerow oak in the originating pastureland. I would be surprised, if it is healthy, that the council would clear this (their tree officer would surely object, if it was brought to his attention).


The area which is now the equivalent of hay meadow covers old graves, now seldom if at all visited, so being obscured by hay in the summer isn't an issue. Cemeteries are long-term investments in the ecology - new burials will, for some time, I'm sure, be kept clear to allow ease of visiting - but over time the reversion of land to a 'wilder' (without being scrub woodland) state is something to be encouraged (and means that the cost of upkeep, not mowing during the summer for instance, will be contained).


We need to consider the long-run life(!) of a cemetery - bits will be old burials, bits new - and these will be treated and look different. Trying to freeze in time the look of the cemetery makes no real sense, but a long term plan which is sensitive both to the environment and to the needs of those wishing to use it for its primary purpose does make sense. The continuation of overgrown elements (particularly where access to these is actually hazardous with unstable monuments) really doesn't make sense in this context. Sensible planting of native species in recovered areas (like the dogwood plantation at the Langston Rise end) seem a good option - so Hawthorne and Elder additionally planted once the scrub has been recovered - but in an appropriate position for using the cemetery - again makes sense.


Leaving self-seeded shrubs wherever they have happened to self-seed doesn't in a managed environment, which is what a cemetery needs to be. Even the growth in Dulwich Woods (which really are woods, and managed as such, if only secondary growth around a former railway line) have to be tended to carefully. No woods are really wild in the UK, nor would you actually want them to be.

Penguin68, you sound well informed. Are you able to put that to good use by talking directly to the people in charge of the cemetery and their bosses?

Whilst it's a good thing to share you knowledge here it's unlikely to reach the powers that be unless you make an effort to do so.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am very concerned about moves to attempt to

> further en-forest what has traditionally been

> meadowland in Camberwell Old Cemetery.


Have you seen this:


http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/object/4590467108


Make your own judgment about these people.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...