Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> ...i won't mention my PokerStars account :(


I watched a bit of Texas Hold 'em on one of the Sky Sports channels last night, scary how quickly people were losing hundreds of ?s. The presenter guy said he prefers to play Omaha, more skill involved, is this true?..

No. I don't think so. You're never that far ahead in Omaha so you are on thinner margins which means a reasonable tactic is to shove all in with many hands pre or on the flop, especially if you think the other player is better than you. I guess at a really high level where you know the percentages spot on and are really good at calculating your opponents ranges then maybe there's more skill but my suspicion is that the top players are just gambling . I think 'cos Omaha is played less and there is less theory/hand analysis out there then for the top players if they think they have an edge on other pros then maybe that's a plus EV spot for them, whereas most of the really top players are just swapping chips around at hold 'em . Personally not a big fan of Omaha, I like Omaha Hi/Lo though.


Hundreds? We have had several pots for over a $ million on our site.

Split pot highest and lowest hands win but the lo must be a low hand under 8. The pot is shared ie you just bet generically, ideally you want your hand to be working both ways as about a 1/3 of the time plus there won't be a low hand


So, best starting cards are AA23 double suited.


I play hi/lo stud a bit too

nope. Not at all. Just higher level thinking. He thinks that I'm thinking he's got this so he'll think I've got this if i take this action blah de bklah...a bit like that old Racey song Little does she know that I know that she knows etc You can represnt hands (bluff) on the internet with the right lines of play and bet sizes etc


you choose your spots against the approriate players to make bluffs, certain types of bluff work with certain players, certain bluffs with others, A lot of beginner players are just looking at their own 2 cards for instance and you won't bluff them off any piece of the flop they've got. It's actually easier to bluff better players to a degree.


Poker's endlessy fascinating and complicated for a simple game in principle I've played seriously for 8 years and am still getting my head round some of the advanced theory.

''You can represnt hands (bluff) on the internet with the right lines of play and bet sizes etc''


That's what struck me about watching it last night, punters were just going all in all the time. Online poker has taken away the face to face element of bluffing.

Personally I would ban sunglasses in 'live' games :)

Let me expand on just one example of a bluff online. Say we have a pot for $1 dollar between me and a random player. Crap players will quite often try and bluff with a minimum bet into that of say 6c (that's 5% of pot value) of the pot if . Now if I've a draw or a made hand or a decent high card, I'll call that all day long as if i hit I'm getting paid off and 6c to see another card for a 106C pot is nothing. ( A decent player with a hand (or not) will bet at least 50C into that pot incidentally) . So, if someone does that to me online and I've nothing I almost immediately raise say 25C that's enough and they almost always fold on their stooopid fishy bet. If they don't they have practicall always got the low card on the flop paired.


Now, if i am playing someone semi-decent and I hit a flop very hard I will sometimes make a 6c bet because thy'll as likely think what a donkey and reraise me with nothing (like I just did to the bad player) and then I will reriase them again, they will then probably fold but I've still got more mobney bacjk with that play than if i'd har raised them say 60C on the flop as I should (technically) you see? Bluff and play that is player dependent and nothing to do with your cards.

  • 2 weeks later...

Good news and bad news.


A month ago put biggish bet on Silviniaco Conti for the King George, saw it win on tv under Ruby Walsh and it could be the next Kauto they said.. It won again at Haydock yesterday. Immediately Paul Nichols stated it would be in the Gold Cup (2nd fav) but definitely would not run in the King George. Drat and double drat.


On the other hand. Rory gave me a big win today. Was fascinating to watch Rory react to Justin Rose's final round 62 with 5 birdies. Brilliant viewing especially when you have a few quid on.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We’ve got a gap on the roof of our shed that needs patching  don’t want to buy a huge roll so hoping someone has some leftover  happy to collect/reimburse 
    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...