Jump to content

Betting Matters....

Mick Mac

By Mick Mac
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> ...i won't mention my PokerStars account :(


I watched a bit of Texas Hold 'em on one of the Sky Sports channels last night, scary how quickly people were losing hundreds of ?s. The presenter guy said he prefers to play Omaha, more skill involved, is this true?..

????

????

Posted
Posted

No. I don't think so. You're never that far ahead in Omaha so you are on thinner margins which means a reasonable tactic is to shove all in with many hands pre or on the flop, especially if you think the other player is better than you. I guess at a really high level where you know the percentages spot on and are really good at calculating your opponents ranges then maybe there's more skill but my suspicion is that the top players are just gambling . I think 'cos Omaha is played less and there is less theory/hand analysis out there then for the top players if they think they have an edge on other pros then maybe that's a plus EV spot for them, whereas most of the really top players are just swapping chips around at hold 'em . Personally not a big fan of Omaha, I like Omaha Hi/Lo though.


Hundreds? We have had several pots for over a $ million on our site.

????

????

Posted
Posted

Split pot highest and lowest hands win but the lo must be a low hand under 8. The pot is shared ie you just bet generically, ideally you want your hand to be working both ways as about a 1/3 of the time plus there won't be a low hand


So, best starting cards are AA23 double suited.


I play hi/lo stud a bit too

????

????

Posted
Posted

nope. Not at all. Just higher level thinking. He thinks that I'm thinking he's got this so he'll think I've got this if i take this action blah de bklah...a bit like that old Racey song Little does she know that I know that she knows etc You can represnt hands (bluff) on the internet with the right lines of play and bet sizes etc


you choose your spots against the approriate players to make bluffs, certain types of bluff work with certain players, certain bluffs with others, A lot of beginner players are just looking at their own 2 cards for instance and you won't bluff them off any piece of the flop they've got. It's actually easier to bluff better players to a degree.


Poker's endlessy fascinating and complicated for a simple game in principle I've played seriously for 8 years and am still getting my head round some of the advanced theory.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

''You can represnt hands (bluff) on the internet with the right lines of play and bet sizes etc''


That's what struck me about watching it last night, punters were just going all in all the time. Online poker has taken away the face to face element of bluffing.

Personally I would ban sunglasses in 'live' games :)

????

????

Posted
Posted

Let me expand on just one example of a bluff online. Say we have a pot for $1 dollar between me and a random player. Crap players will quite often try and bluff with a minimum bet into that of say 6c (that's 5% of pot value) of the pot if . Now if I've a draw or a made hand or a decent high card, I'll call that all day long as if i hit I'm getting paid off and 6c to see another card for a 106C pot is nothing. ( A decent player with a hand (or not) will bet at least 50C into that pot incidentally) . So, if someone does that to me online and I've nothing I almost immediately raise say 25C that's enough and they almost always fold on their stooopid fishy bet. If they don't they have practicall always got the low card on the flop paired.


Now, if i am playing someone semi-decent and I hit a flop very hard I will sometimes make a 6c bet because thy'll as likely think what a donkey and reraise me with nothing (like I just did to the bad player) and then I will reriase them again, they will then probably fold but I've still got more mobney bacjk with that play than if i'd har raised them say 60C on the flop as I should (technically) you see? Bluff and play that is player dependent and nothing to do with your cards.

  • 2 weeks later...
Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Good news and bad news.


A month ago put biggish bet on Silviniaco Conti for the King George, saw it win on tv under Ruby Walsh and it could be the next Kauto they said.. It won again at Haydock yesterday. Immediately Paul Nichols stated it would be in the Gold Cup (2nd fav) but definitely would not run in the King George. Drat and double drat.


On the other hand. Rory gave me a big win today. Was fascinating to watch Rory react to Justin Rose's final round 62 with 5 birdies. Brilliant viewing especially when you have a few quid on.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • first mate
      Fireworks

      By first mate · Posted

      I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • David Peckham
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By David Peckham · Posted

      There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • CPR Dave
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • CPR Dave
      Dell Autos is closing tomorrow

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      Yep. And Pitstop.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...