Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good win at Ascot today and back to 3972. Two

> years now since I put on ?30 and it has been

> rolling ever since, with a few hiccups.

>

> Liverpool for the league at 33s looks good too.


Are you saying Mick you've never added to your original investment (apart from winnings)?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good win at Ascot today and back to 3972. Two

> > years now since I put on ?30 and it has been

> > rolling ever since, with a few hiccups.

> >

> > Liverpool for the league at 33s looks good too.

>

> Are you saying Mick you've never added to your

> original investment (apart from winnings)?


Yes nothing in and nothing out for 2 years. Pretty good eh :)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also had a punt on the PO flotation as it looks

> like a no brainer......I expect my lefty mates

> will be livid but i don't think they read this bit

> much :)


I did it too. Waiting to see the level of scaleback. Not sure its a betting matter but thats up for debate.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also had a punt on the PO flotation as it looks

> like a no brainer......I expect my lefty mates

> will be livid but i don't think they read this bit

> much :)

I hope you were not too greedy Quids.


The Telegraph understands that plans being drawn up in Whitehall could see those who applied for tens of thousands of pounds worth of shares excluded from the stock market flotation next week. They will be told of the decision tomorrow.

It had previously been thought that all investors who applied for shares would be granted some stock - although it is now expected that tens of thousands of more wealthy investors will be snubbed.

The exact "cut-off" point will be decided today, but is likely to be those who applied for more than between ?40,000 and ?50,000 worth of shares. It may be set as low as ?10,000.

Others may receive fewer shares than they had hoped.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, not won an accie yet but using the free bet on

> reasonable bankers so below the Accies minimum 2/1

> odds, if I win an average odds Accies I,ll be

> about even this weekend if I win say 4 over the

> season and my free bets got to odds then I,ll make

> a profit...depends a bit on my free

> bets...ivevbeen backing spurs a lot so won a bit

> at ok odds, man city at home don,t return much!


I still keep hearing this offer of a 'free' bet on the radio. How are you doing ????'s?

Still not hit an accie : (, but I've missed a few weekends and the've still offered me a free bet anyway...free bets I am below odds...so poor betting is not allowing me to see if there are any catches for winners!


In other news, 66/1 on a 5-0 whitewash after the first test is looking nice!


Horses - anyone got any views on the King George?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's not a bad idea, though I also want to keep the site as simple and user friendly as possibly. It's ultimately about getting a balance between being informative and being a good read. Stars are useful but I'd like people to read the reviews too. 
    • Standard places haven’t got any? Anyone seen any on sale this week? thanks
    • Sue. You really don’t have to keep saying about the electoral system    a) we all know about it b) it doesn’t matter    FPTP is the system we have always had and hopefully we will get rid of it someday but it is what it is    when anyone suggests changing the system Corbyn is right there at the front of the queue to prevent it   so its pointless him or any of supporters complaining about it    the evidence you want is the result of the elections. You can’t have clearer evidence. 
    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...