Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


My girlfriend and I are getting a dog and, after much thought, have pretty much decided on getting a miniature schnauzer. Just wondered if there were any other miniature schnauzer owners or at least if anyone knows of any who can advise me of the dog's temperament, health issues, grooming requirements, etc. Of course the Internet provides this information but wanted to ask on the forum, so that I can have accurate, first-hand opinions.


Am general looking for an honest, overall summary of their mini schnauzers...


Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/68371-any-miniature-schnauzer-owners/
Share on other sites

You must make sure the parents are tested for health conditions that affect the breed, especially PRA Progressive Retinal Atrophy, its hereditary and my Poodle has been blind since 5 years old, its previlant in Schnauzers. Lovely temprament, we got one for my 9 year old neice, he died aged 16 or 17 and he got a bit grumpy when he was really old, but he was a cracker of a dog, good with kids etc. As for grooming, they are meant to have a wirey coat which if you were showing would need to be handstripped, but most Schnauzers seem to have a soft coat nowadays and therefore need to be clipped, this should be done about every 10 weeks depending on how you want your dog to look, shaggy or preened, they have hair in their ears which is usually plucked during the groom. A neutered dogs coat can change (hormones) ie a black Schnauzer can turn really silvery and a salt and pepper can fade, this can also happen if they are clipped. Over all, I like them, I love the square terrier look, but they are more laid back, they can have a high pitched bark, even as they get older, not all do though, there are loads in the area at Peckham Rye park and Dulwich your bound to come across some, do your research, especially when it comes to a good breeder and the health issues, happy hunting and I hope I was helpful :)

They do have a high pitched bark, and because of that, I couldn't ever get one, even though they are very popular now. My cousins used to have them back in the day, one after another, and the barking to me was like squeaky chalk on a blackboard.


Bonniebird makes very good points.

My friend had one, its bark was annoying. The grooming can be tiresome, and with pedigree dogs there can be the health/ eyes, back etc issues because of inter-breeding etc ...


My afghan was a lovely chilled out character, but high maintenance grooming.

My border collie was hard work, demanding attention and constantly wanting something to do !! Drive you bonkers ...

best all rounders were a stray small golden mongrel, and a lurcher cross.

I would advise anyone thinking of getting a dog, to GO TO BATTERSEA !! You could find a lovely dog, that would be so grateful to you, and not be giving hundreds of pounds to an unscrupulous puppy farmer. Battersea work hard to match dogs and owners. Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let them go bust.  Enact emergency legislation to ensure that the water still flows and the rest of the network operates. Why should we care what happens to the investors.  Have no idea could or would this work, and where next. And the workers will still be needed whoever runs the show.
    • I think you might mean 'repossession' rather than 'reprocessing'.  
    • I think this is a bit of a myth.  It's true that some of the current owners are pension funds (chiefly the Ontario Universities') but they're global outfits, big enough to know what they're about. As for ordinary UK pension funds, they mostly invest in publicly-tradeable stocks, which Thames no longer is (it's a private limited company, not a PLC), so even those that lazily track the markets by buying everything in the index won't be exposed as Thames isn't in any index. In other words, it's a lot less complicated than Thames, the Government or innumerable consultancies and PR outfits would like you to believe. In case, incidentally, the idea of a cooperative offends any delicate Thatcherite sensibilities, I'd argue that it fits the Thatcherite vision of a stakeholding democracy much better than selling tradeable shares to the public very cheaply. The public, despite their blessable cottons, are too easily tempted by the small but easy win (which is how they sold off their own building societies, preparing the ground for the credit crunch and then the crash) and, as became obvious after every privatisation before or since, their modest stakes inevitably end up in the hands of financial engineers whose only priority is to siphon off the assets and leave the husk to either go bankrupt or get "rescued" by the taxpayers (who thus get to pay twice for nothing). The root of that is the concept of "limited liability" which makes it all possible, but even the most nauseating free-market optimist would struggle to predict the demise of that.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...