Jump to content

18 month to 2 and half years football classes


kickstars

Recommended Posts

Kickstars are happy to announce two brand new

fantastic classes starting in September.

18 month to 2 and half years

1st month?s fees half price

1st session is free


NEW CLASSES


Mondays

Dulwich Village

ST BARNABAS PARISH HALL

23 Dulwich Village SE21 7BT

BABYSTARS (18 Months to 2.5 yrs)

09.00am to 09.30am


Thursdays

Crystal Palace

PHOENIX COMMUNITY CENTRE

66 Westow St

Upper Norwood SE19 3AF

BABYSTARS (18 months to 2.5 yrs)

10.00am to 10.30am


CURRENT CLASSES


Mondays

Dulwich Village

ST BARNABAS PARISH HALL

23 Dulwich Village SE21 7BT

MINISTARS

(2 to 3.5 yrs)

09.30 to 10.15am


Thursdays

Crystal Palace

PHOENIX COMMUNITY

CENTRE

66 Westow St

Upper Norwood SE19 3AF

MINISTARS

(2 to 3.5 yrs)

10.30am to 11.15am


Saturdays

Crystal Palace

LEWIS SPORTS CENTRE

Maberley Rd SE19 2JH


MIGHTYSTARS

(3 to 5 yrs)

09.00 to 09.45am

MIGHTYSTARS

(4 to 6 yrs)

09.00 am to 10.00 am


SESSIONS BELOW ARE OUTSIDE


Sydenham Girls High School

16 Westwood Hill

Se26 6bl

MEGASTARS

(5 to 8yrs)

10.15 am to 11.30am

MASTERSTARS

(8 to 11yrs)

11.00 am to 12.30pm


Contact us to reserve your place!

[email protected], 07852943104 FB kickstars London

Many thanks

Tuna

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...