Jump to content

Do not use these end of tenancy cleaners no matter what


DulwichElsi

Recommended Posts

Hi SE22ers


So I'm writing this because I wished I was warned by someone about what charlatans these cleaners are. Some people previously recommended these people for an End of Tenancy clean (they lived next to Goose Green like us) but they were just awful.


If you search for end of tenancy cleaners in East Dulwich, they come up.


They also have various alias: www.endoftenancycleaning-london.org.uk www.besthousecleaning.co.uk

www.bestcarpetscleaninglondon.co.uk


They were late, all they did was wipe over surfaces, left the place dirty and the ONE cleaner they sent over was rude and refused to speak English. She also refused to clean caked areas of dirt when I came back to pay.


I sent them video evidence and photos of this and they refused to refund me the money or even to make her do the job. I even have videos showing me cleaning the areas that she should've cleaned. Including the toilet, the shower, the tiles. It as a joke.


I spent days off work and loss of earnings to be there for the cleaner.


Then because our landlord was unhappy we got them to come back. She was 2.5 hours late. She then refused to clean today and swore at me and waved her hand in my face. I spoke to the "head office" on the phone and they refused to refund me the money or make her finish the job.


It's been hell. Utter hell. And I wish no one else have to go through the collosal hassle that my husband and I have had to go through. It was expensive too and in total ?153 with the carpets.


It's not just about doing the job properly. It has added several days or knock on effects of negotiating with landlords, missing work and having to clean ourselves, even though we paid for this service.


If I am allowed to on here, I'm happy to post the pictures and the cleaning pics and videos, including that of me having to clean the counters while the cleaner packed up.


L

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
    • I'm not sure that's true. I don't know how they bill (and I might be wrong) but I doubt they get paid each time they turn up at court and a witness or defendant fails to show, or the printer's broken, or  the loos have flooded, or whatever. I think most remaining criminal barristers and solicitors these days (now there's no money in it) genuinely care about the justice system and would like to see trials coming to court quicker, but not like this. Plus, I don't see how these measures will help - they won't suddenly magic up all the courtrooms the system demands (that prev govts shut down), and do we even have enough mags to pick up all the extra non jury cases that will arise? Picking and panelling juries isn't what's causing the delay in trials going to court.     
    • Well, this is it isn’t  it?    this does see to be an ongoing problem since oooh I’m gonna say 2016. For some reason  governments playing to a populist right wing media without foundations in reality, all in the hope of a supportive headline that will never come 
    • I happen to think jury trials are a good idea and the government should be spending efforts making them more efficient and bringing them to court more quickly. However, criminal barristers have a huge conflict of self interest in lengthy delayed jury trials and I've not seen any of them mention that when they argue against these new proposals.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...