Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks quids. I was thinking of starting the same topic ....


Speaking for myself, I have more friends as a result of use of the internet - especially people I have met through this forum and the associated drinks. However I am prob not a typical social networker. Most of my online interaction is with people that I have met in person, or at least it is on forums/ sites where I have met some of the people.


Trying to put myself into a timewarp and consider what it would be like to be a teenager now, I probably would have more interactions with other people than I did then. But this is hard to judge.

Technology does not = behaviour. That is a ludicrously simplistic view of the world. Such technological determinism does not credit individuals with minds of their own.


You can't blame a technology. It's how people respond to it.


Shall we blame the penny post for social ills? Or the telephone? Electricity, perhaps? Or perhaps the car is responsible for much of what we see?


There will be people who use it one way, and people who use it another. There may be some trends, and these will change over time, but they will be responding to very complex webs of technologies, behaviours, laws, social norms, etc.

Neither completely 'out of touch', but a 'truth' of sorts when he notes:


"Society was losing some of its ability to build communities through inter-personal communication, as the result of excessive use of texts and e-mails rather than face-to-face meetings or telephone conversations.


He said skills such as reading a person's mood and body language were in decline, and that exclusive use of electronic information had a "dehumanising" effect on community life.


These are valid points, bearing in mind Nichols is discussing, mainly, the youth constituency.


What are the effects of all these digital apparatuses on the social, behavioural and ethical development of our young citizens?


Even the ageing 'children' in my peer group are boastful of how many friends they 'have' within their networking sites; what must the pressures be like for kosher kids?


If I had a young child, I would be limiting computer usage in a quite draconian and monitoring fashion, and this runs contrary to my relatively libertarian, communist beliefs.

There may be a danger of confusing the message with the messenger here. If an eminent professor of psychology had spoken those words (as they well could have been), they would have been interpreted on an entirely different level.


I think his message is, largely, correct. Modern technology has tended to depersonalise social relationships, which is probably a bad thing when that represents a young person's only experience of life beyond the family.

Anyone who has attended a forum drinks night,

or made a purchase,

received sound advice,

learned something useful,

hired a tradesman,

or sold an item,

may all thank Mark for starting this electronic club.

If this is the most convenient and successful way of meeting local neighbours for some of us, then so be it.

One can always brush up on meeting skills on drinks nights etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor? Can't be just be struck off, or the equivalent?
    • There are no road works in front of Cod fellas and yesterday when I requested a stop there the driver went straight past and never stopped untill Avondale Riss. As cars have to stop because of the lights why can busses not do this? 1 minute Bloodly mindedness.
    • These are the smokeless fuels you can burn on a open fireplace in Southwark: https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuels-php/england/ https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/environment/air-quality/reduce-air-pollution/reduce-smoke
    • Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst. He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition. There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star: ** WARNING** This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered. The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone. STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.   Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned   shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.   Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.   Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...