Jump to content

Jumperoo - 1x original & 1x space saver, plus baby bath seat


Recommended Posts

Also babysafe bath seat like this one:-

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B00859RC04/ref=mp_s_a_1_5?qid=1441574738&sr=8-5&pi=AC_SX110_SY165&keywords=baby+bath+seat&dpPl=1&dpID=41bxbgfV6ZL&ref=plSrch#immersive-view_1441574751320


Space saver jumperoo in excellent condition, only 5 months old and hardly used as we bought it to take camping then didn't have room! ?25

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B00R6CIK7A/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1441574812&sr=8-1&pi=SY200_QL40&keywords=spacesaver+jumperoo&dpPl=1&dpID=51NHcxLojOL&ref=plSrch#immersive-view_1441574830288


Original jumperoo is in good, but well used condition. It has a rip to the outer lining of the seat but it has no effect on the strength of the seat fabric, it's like a thin mesh which covers the main seat body. I have repaired it with a bit of glue just so it doesn't hang down, but it really was only for the sake of aesthetics. Only want ?10 for this because of the rip.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...