Jump to content

Monday only Nanny Share - Herne Hill


ErinR

Recommended Posts

We have an absolutely fabulous nanny, Catherine, who has worked for us for the last five years. We currently have a Monday share arrangement with another family, which is finishing at the end of October. We'd like to find another family who are looking for Monday only care. Catherine works 7:30am to 6pm looking after our two girls, aged 8 and 5. They're both at local schools so Catherine leaves the house at 8am and 3pm to do the school runs from our home on Hollingbourne Road, SE24. Catherine looks after another baby at our house Tuesday to Thursday so we have everything for small children - high chairs, stair gates, car seats, etc. Because we value Catherine so highly, we subsidize nanny shares so another family will only pay ?7 per hour plus tax (i.e. ?7 x 1.4) and your child gets sole care while our girls are in school. We pay the payroll costs, OFSTED registration, first aid certificate and car insurance. Our previous nanny shares have only finished because the other families have moved out of the area or had more children - they've all absolutely loved Catherine and children adore her. If this is something you're interested in, please PM me. Thanks, Erin

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...