Jump to content

Is there a time limit on property alterations that didn't have planning permission?


Recommended Posts

My flat has had internal reorganisation of rooms - approx 10 years ago and a new lease secured since then. The freeholder has recently said his intention of forcing the original layout to be applied (but funnily says he doesn't know what it was)


Does anyone have any experience of this, please?

Changing an internal layout of rooms does not require council planning permission - there will be building regs issues when/ if load bearing walls are removed. However I suspect that a landlord could require restoration on any unauthorised changes to a rented flat. If your flat is leasehold (i.e. you own it, but someone else holds the property freehold) - then I think it would depend on what the lease says about work on the flat. Clearly a freeholder has an interest in alterations which might impact the structural integrity of the property - and I suppose if the lease is short then in the value of the property per se - a 2 bed property may have a higher value than a one large bed property, for instance.


If it is a leasehold property and the lease is silent about internal re-organsiation (outwith structural issues) then I think one could argue that a 10 year old change (with a new lease given on the changed property) would give a good case to resist the freeholder. Indeed one could argue that the lease being renewed on the altered property immediately validates the alteration.


But your best recourse is to get qualified advice from a solicitor - this will cost money initially but may save your more money and grief down the line.

  • 10 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, it's not completely analogous. But no one in their right minds doubts that he's a villain who incited the storming of the capital, it goes without saying. But I see what you mean about re-examining the events, of course. As I said, a less-than-one-second flash frame would have meant we'd never even be having this discussion.  He's also a litigious tyrant who's suing a US Network, which has directly led to a loss of income for me and many colleagues. I hate the guy.  That's why broadcasters can't give him any ammunition and must keep their noses clean.  Yes, I'm all up for less aggy, I don't like it one bit. 
    • My wife lost a gold hoop earring with faux diamonds somewhere between Peckham Rye and Herne Hill on Tues 11 Nov. It's about an inch diameter with an interesting 'twist' pattern. She'd be extremely grateful to get it back on the off chance that anyone has found it! 
    • Sorry if this is bullying, or name calling or whatever  but anyone quoting Rupert Lowe is just never ever going to have a valid point  several people misreported  that line not just the bbc - seems to have been a mishearing and I’ve seen plenty of corrections   So I don’t think it was a lie (it remains a curious distinction tho why say foreigners and nationals at all   If you want to bring back the death penalty why mention this distinction?)   Here’s a question. If Lowe or his party took power and introduced the death penalty, do you think proportionally more “nationals” or”foreign born” would receive  the death penalty? Because I think I know the answer and so do you  This bastion of truth.  Rupert Lowe https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?d=NEWS_PS I wouldnt put him on any pedestal above the bbc   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...