Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://aeon.co/magazine/health/the-shame-of-poor-teeth-in-a-rich-world/


What's the Brit perspective on this article? My sister-in-law (a dentist in the States) found it offensive on the basis personal choice, not poverty, is the main contributing factor to poor teeth.


I don't agree with her, because I think it's hard for children to outrun some of the elements of poverty that contribute to poor dental health.


Should dental health (and personal hygiene) be taught in schools? Or is that solely parents' responsibility?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/77278-poor-teeth-rich-world/
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about. I have seen a specialist endodontist for root canal work, and I've also had a dental implant done by peridontal specialist. I've recently had a chipped lower molar whicg isd a little bit painful so I might need a CEREC restoration for that one. But I've never had any dental health lessons at school.

I think my SiL finds the article offensive bc she sees patients who have neglected their teeth, but still feel entitled to what little free/low income support there is in the US for dentistry in general.


How much of that is poor choice vs poor education? I don't know. And I've certainly never felt a sense of entitlement to dental care in Britain, more a resignation to how limited NHS dental support often (not always) is.


Also, the article's point about people judging you by "poor" teeth in the US has some truth to it... maybe not so much here?

Sounds like a somewhat (stereo)typical reaction from a US upper-middle-class (for that is what being an MD etc makes you in the money-based class system over in the States) dentist. She has a point: nobody is making the bad-toothed person not take care of their teeth but s/he is much more likely to be poorly informed than a middle-class person (by which I mean, in States vernacular, anyone with a mortgage and a job).

I have friends brought up in the '70s and '80s who have about one filling each. I think all of them were from areas where water was fluoridated.

Education is important and should be given freely and early in the child's life but personal and parental responsibility has to take over.

It's also worth pointing out that it's not always poor dental hygeine that leads to dental decay, but lack of visits to the dentist. Fear of the dentist is a real issue, often formed through negative childhood experiences. If you then combine that with not everyone's teeth being the same, then some people will need more treatment no matter how well they look after their mouth. Some people have stronger teeth that are less prone to decay than others, just as some people have acidic imbalances in their saliva that subject their teeth to more attack than others. Teeth root into bone, so if you have healthy bone you are going to do better than if you have problems. It is also possible to overbrush, just as brushing within 40 mins of a meal is the wrong time to brush (at one time people were encourage to brush immediately after every meal).


It stands to reason that where heathcare is private, poorer people can't afford to see a dentist as often, just as in the UK, only limited treatments are allowed on the NHS and the result is that many people who can't afford private dentistry lose teeth that would be saved under private treatment. Even the quality of something like a crown, is inferior in materials on the NHS.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...