Jump to content

Recommended Posts

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha all! As Peckham is considered so trendy these

> days wherever he actually lives it's probably

> better to say Peckham though I doubt he'd go to

> the lengths of actually getting off at PR and then

> walk to Nunhead!


It's definitely nearer to Nunhead train station than PR or QR.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cella Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I doubt he'd go to the lengths of actually

> getting off at PR and then

> > walk to Nunhead!

>

> I'm not sure where the boundary of Nunhead lies

> (and I hasten to add I've certainly never seen

> "first dates"), but Nunhead green is a pretty easy

> walk from PR station - along Philip Walk or Scylla

> Rd - and Peckham Rye is approximately 5 times more

> useful than Nunhead station!


I regularly beat the bounds of ED, so I'm knowledgeable about local boundaries - please see my previous posts about local boundaries. So when I say Nunhead, I mean Nunhead, not Peckham or Peckham Rye.

Maybe he likes walking, keeps him fit. Maybe he doesn?t want people to know where he lives. Maybe he stops off somewhere on the way home.

Anyway isn?t Nunhead Village posh and still SE15 and under Peckham Boundaries? Beside most people know of Peckham but not Nunhead so it?s easier just to say Peckham for those that don?t know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...