Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you are seeking to get a CPZ (parking stress discussion), we found the best way was to get a large petition organised (in excess of I think 300 names is required) which sets out the locals want a CPZ and acknowledge the cost of ?125 per year to pay for it. This can be presented at the community council, who in response will usually order a CPZ consultation.


We did this to great effect in the Toast Rack as the consultation has led to a recommendation for implementation of a CPZ.

Hi James - wonder if you can help? We live on Melbourne Gr in ED and back onto the old hospital site. As you know, work has begun clearing the massive amount of rubble away. The only slight issue we have is that there is a generator being left on round the clock, which is really audible when we're trying to sleep. I can't see any lights being used overnight, so not sure what purpose it serves. Can you investigate? Many thanks. Andy

Hello Cllr Barber


I notice there has been an effort to clear abandoned and wrecked bicycles from public cycle stands in the local area. Please add the one outside 45, Upland road, which has been there for many many months to the list.


Thanks for this initiative

jimlad48 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you are seeking to get a CPZ (parking stress

> discussion), we found the best way was to get a

> large petition organised (in excess of I think 300

> names is required) which sets out the locals want

> a CPZ and acknowledge the cost of ?125 per year to

> pay for it. This can be presented at the community

> council, who in response will usually order a CPZ

> consultation.

>

> We did this to great effect in the Toast Rack as

> the consultation has led to a recommendation for

> implementation of a CPZ.


Where's the toast rack?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Where's the toast rack?


Over there, behind the cornflakes...or the series of long straight roads running off Peckham Road - Bushey Hill, Crofton, Shenley, Talfourd - also the ones running off Shenley, Linell, Oswyth etc. Estate agent coinage I believe - there's a very trendy area next to Wandsworth Common known as the toastrack, so I guess they thought they'd import it.

Any feedback on this, James? The other thread is now saying it's been reported in the press that the sorting office is to close. It will be a great loss to the area if this is allowed to happen.


Mrs D Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James,there is another thread on here about the

> sorting office on sylvester rd potentially

> closing. Do you know if this is true or not? It

> would be a great loss to the area if it is.

Hi James,


Not sure if this question has been asked already, but do you know when Arriva will be replacing its absurdly noisy and dirty 176 fleet? I note that the 363 and 185 have recently been upgraded to Enviro400s and was wondering if there we any plans to replace the current 176 buses with something similar?

Ampersand Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi James,

>

> Not sure if this question has been asked already,

> but do you know when Arriva will be replacing its

> absurdly noisy and dirty 176 fleet? I note that

> the 363 and 185 have recently been upgraded to

> Enviro400s and was wondering if there we any plans

> to replace the current 176 buses with something

> similar?



I can't agree more, I saw an 176 going down the street yesterday and it sounded like it was mechanically ill. The engine was very loud while trying to go down LL.

James.

State of pavement outside new proposed Vets. This has been left in an appalling condition by the contractor's will this be left for the council to put right or can we get the contractor's back to do it correctly thus saving the tax payer's money.

Hi bob,

Will get onto that pavement being resolve - have reported it. Thanks.


Hi Nigello, geobz, Ampersand,

I looked into this last summer - this was first raised on this thread several years ago. WE had agreement then for N176 to use quieter buses but that left daytime...

The 176 and N176 bus routes are currently in a tendering process. Tenders had to be retuned 17 Jan and a decision is expected shortly in March. The new contract starts 11 November and I've been told will include new buses which should be EURO6 compliant and much quieter.

MarkT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James,

> 203/205 Crystal Palace Road, on the corner with

> Silvester Road, has been demolished. Southwark's

> planning map shows no planning history. Has an

> application been submitted?

> MarkT


James, Southwark's planning map seems to be out of action. Do you have any info on this?

MarkT

Mark ,that map can be a bit tempremental but if you're quick you might catch it as it seems ok at the moment .


16/AP/3281 | Change of use and part retention/demolition of No 201 to provide 1 x 3 bed house (Use Class C3) and demolition of No.s 203-205 and the erection of a new building comprising 8 x residential apartments (Use Class C3) and associated landscaping, cycling and refuse storage facilities | 201-205 CRYSTAL PALACE ROAD, LONDON, SE22 9EW

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi bob,

> Will get onto that pavement being resolve - have

> reported it. Thanks.

>

> Hi Nigello, geobz, Ampersand,

> I looked into this last summer - this was first

> raised on this thread several years ago. WE had

> agreement then for N176 to use quieter buses but

> that left daytime...

> The 176 and N176 bus routes are currently in a

> tendering process. Tenders had to be retuned 17

> Jan and a decision is expected shortly in March.

> The new contract starts 11 November and I've been

> told will include new buses which should be EURO6

> compliant and much quieter.


That's great. Thanks for the Info James.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...