Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Morning James! There's a crew of builders with a cement mixer on the lane this morning, next to William Rose. They're blocking the pavement so that pedestrians - including kids on their way to school - have to walk out onto the road. We asked them to open the barriers to let pedestrians through safely. They initially refused then we just walked through and others followed (see picture). Please can something be done?!

Hi singalto,

I have contacted Royal Mail and taken part in a first conference call with them.

They explained that 8 February a feasibility study about closing East Dulwich SE22 sorting office. That a final decision hasn't been taken yet.

I explained residents are under the impression two reasons for this proposal. 1st lack of Royal Mail parking and 2nd the increased volume of parcels.

For the former I suggested it might be possible to permanently allocated several spaces if we knew what the scale of this issue was. For the latter issue they couldn't quantify the scale of this problem on our call.

They have promised to find out more detail for our second call early next week.

One comment they made is if the sorting office closed they could potentially provide an alternate location for parcels such as a local post office. I explained the local Crown Post Office on Lordship Lane appears to have only limited space. Frankly if this was a viable solution then the current sorting office would have even more space to remain open.

Hi jLo,

Apologies for not picking this up sooner - real stinker of a cold that is proving hard to recover from. For something urgent like this please always email directly. I would have seen it on Friday and acted immediately.

Either way I've now reported it and hope we can ensure it doesn't happen again. Unacceptable.


jLo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Morning James! There's a crew of builders with a

> cement mixer on the lane this morning, next to

> William Rose. They're blocking the pavement so

> that pedestrians - including kids on their way to

> school - have to walk out onto the road. We asked

> them to open the barriers to let pedestrians

> through safely. They initially refused then we

> just walked through and others followed (see

> picture). Please can something be done?!

Hi James .. there is a little sink hole opened up at the bottom of east dulwich rd, goose green side .. any plans to get this fixed? Its wrecking my car every time i turn in .. it must be a nightmare for cyclists .


Also all the bins in st francis park are literally rotting away .. all broke, massive holes, doors swinging open etc. They're such an eye sore. Can we get them fixed?

Hi shell,

Apologies for delay coming back to you - terrible cold.

Have reported both. Latter will be much more painful to solve as Sainsbury's responsibility and after a number of years have obtained minimal traction with them - they're ignoring a legal requirement on them to properly maintain St.Francis Park and the council is understandably loath to spend lots on lawyers to make it happen..

Hi James

Could you lean on Thames Water about the leak on Worlingham Rd? It's been running for a couple of weeks now and it seems a waste. Not to mention my worries about our cellar flooding. A van came and drew a chalk mark round it initially, but that's been it.

I'm guessing there will be build outs to make it impossible for delivery lorries to turn the corner without driving across the pavement, 30 metres of double yellow lines on all sides of the junctions, a raised table entry with chinese granite to improve the user experience and a few cycle parking facilities to help the environment.


I tried to find the plans on Southwark's website that I would have thought MGTAC must have been required to submit to obtain funding but couldn't see them. Interestingly what the website does say about CGS funding is that grants are to be implemented and project managed by the incorporated association that applied for funding[ERRONEOUS REFERENCE TO ?5K DELETED] . So it won't be the council that oversees these works.


Since writing this I've checked the CGS application page again and see that I misread it. the link is here:http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/info/200256/cleaner_greener_safer/3871/cgs_capital_grants_application_process

Hi James, can you also give us an update on the possible closure of the sorting office on Silvester Road? Your last post on the subject said you were going to have a follow-up conversation with Royal Mail at the beginning of March. Many thanks for anything you can do to help prevent this closure going ahead.

Hi, I'm here, but haven't have time to type.


I challenged the whole constitutional process at the DCC meeting, but was fobbed off. Will try to explain more tomorrow... maybe we should resuscitate the old Melbourne Grove thread so that we can have a proper discussion without overloading this thread?

I drive frequently at this junction. I simply do not understand the need to spend money here. It is open, with very good lines of sight. Speeding is rarer here than elsewhere according to the council's own survey. There are countless projects and people in real need who are seeing their funding squeezed, yet thousands of pounds are being put towards this??


Who are the people who make this sort of decision? Do they have any contact at all with those they claim they represent?


Local government is beyond parody.


Ridiculous.

Hi first mate,

The wide splay on northern side allowing faster turning - compare it to the junction with Ashbourne Grove for example.


Hi Jaywalker,

The junction is twice the width of other junctions. Making it normal sized will reduce crossing distances making it safe for people walking. It will also deter articulated lorries from delivering to M&S. This used to be there route for Iceland. Currently M&S is in breach of it's planning conditions but is likely to return to this route as the junction appears designed for articulated lorries to turn.


Hi rch,

The highway changes will be consulted upon which would be a great opportunity for contrary views to object.


Hi Abe_froeman,

You must have been away for a while. I've campaigned to block lots of double yellow lines being installed across East Dulwich. Extra are not part of what I've signed up for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Are there any other executors? Is the solicitor a soke practioner or part of a firm? Are you and your fellow beneficiaries behaving well?  You will want to take proper  legal advice (which this is not) but you can have an executor removed by the court if they are refusing to communicate with you. I would just do that. Tell him you are doing it, tell him you have reported him to the Law Society (if you have) and tell him you will be challenging his fees with the legal services ombudsman. This all sounds outrageous to me and this solicitor doesn't sound fit to practice. Three years sounds far too long for a low value estate comprising mostly of a house. He should have sold that or rented it out whilst he was waiting to administer the estate.    Sounds like he has cost you all a lot of money.  
    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...