Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was defrauded by Amazon. I called and managed to get everything sorted, but what I found galling is that they had the name and address of the perpetrator and refused to file a report with the police. They said it just want't worth their effort, that they write down such losses.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually, you weren't defrauded by Amazon, but by

> a third party using the Amazon platform. I do

> think that Amazon should pursue fraud, but they

> weren't the principal in this, and I am assuming

> you had no material loss.


Sorry, wrote that from my phone and so not particularly eloquent. Of course it wasn't Amazon who defrauded me, but an individual using their platform. Amazon refunded me, so in fact it was Amazon ultimately who were defrauded. They decide not to pursue these cases, even were they have all the information necessary to catch the perpetrators, which I disapprove of. Amazon are not the most community minded of companies of course.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amazon ultimately who were defrauded. They decide

> not to pursue these cases, even were they have all

> the information necessary to catch the

> perpetrators, which I disapprove of.


Credit card companies also don't usually bother pursuing fraud cases. Police won't get involved unless the card company initiates it. You can see why it's tempting to pull this type of scam, when the chances are nobody will even bother looking for the perpetrator! But for these types of company, it's a simple cost/benefit decision..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just for information: I see that the Licensing Sub-committee has the Tesco application as item 1 on their 24 July meeting agenda.  https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=172&MId=8329. The officer's report to the committtee provides a good succinct summary.  I see, from (original) p.31 of the full public pack, that Tesco Legal Dept on 12 June reported that they'd agreed with the police's suggested conditions to be attached to the licence, and the police accordingly withdrew their own representation.  That leaves just one representation, from a member of the public, to be dealt with on the day. I still think it's not necessarily to be presumed that Tesco will definitely be taking over the premises.  I see that Poundland themselves were granted an off-sales licence on 21 Feb 2023, and surrendered it on 3 July 2025.  I'm not sure they actually ever used it themselves.  Did they? https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Statement of Licensing Policy 2021-2026.pdf is a full statement of the policy and its application, for thems as is interested.
    • I'm now just following David Peckham around, posting laughing emojis on all his comments.   
    • Well, quite. Do you know where your lad's going tonight?
    • I'd get rid of duty free shopping.  Nothing to do with tourist tax but something I hate.  All that glitz as you try to get through to Wetherspoons in the departure lounge.  No great savings over on line or even at times supermarkets, and the hypocrisy of selling cheap cancer sticks. Ok back to tourist tax  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...