Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I figure that living in a depressing or non-depressing neighbourhood does actually have medical effects.


Unfortunately what is no doubt of benefit to NHS costs is of no value to council budgets. Our systems are not (yet?) that joined-up.


But it is clear that making a budgetary decision isn't unreasonable, but hiding it in some sort of 'it's for your own good' policy is disingenuous. On another thread I have suggested lower profile trees/ shrubs that would cause less root damage and occupy less pavement space than the (albeit glorious) London Planes. (And it was a more modest tree which would be replaced here anyway). One issue raised (not unreasonably) by Mr Barber on his thread is that trees would require tending - and keeping a tree small and in control would take more than is normally allocated to tree maintenance. However, I would have thought that it is not beyond the bounds of possibility for street residents to 'adopt' trees and care for them outwith the tender (??) mercies of the council. The trees do after all add to their environmental benefit. Rowans and silver birches are reasonably shallow rooted and take a long time for their trunks to achieve any girth. Birches are slightly drought sensitive (being shallow rooted), but recently drought does not seem to have been a problem, locally.


Since the council doesn't really care that much, maybe it's time for some guerrilla gardening?

Perhaps if Cleaner Greener Safer money wasn't being used to fund the Melbourne Grove barrier study there would more left over for things like trees that actually are green!


I wonder if any other London Boroughs have run out of money for trees?

All good points, Penguin68, but I'd be perhaps more optimistic about this:


>>I figure that living in a depressing or non-depressing neighbourhood does actually have medical effects.

>

>Unfortunately what is no doubt of benefit to NHS costs is of no value to council budgets. Our systems are not

>(yet?) that joined-up.


There is more and more hard evidence for the health and well-being benefits of 'greenery' and space in the urban environment and I know that Cllr Hargrove of Southwark's Park and Open Sapces is keen to explore local environmental ideas that promote health and well-being. Perhaps before long 'promoting health and well-being' will be a box that needs ticking in other areas of the council's activities too.

It seems that the new size for tree pits is something of a one-off on the part of Southwark, if my conversations with tree personnel at the council are correct. Most other councils do not adopt this policy, I believe.

More info on why the new rules are being adopted are needed.

There's some rather interesting stuff on the Mayor's website about trees!


https://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/environment/greening-london/re-leaf


I'd be interested to know how many of the 20,000 London street trees Southwark benefitted from.


Even without grants etc, the Forestry Commission Standard Costs for London suggest it would only cost the council ?373.00 to plant a ?standard? tree. Not much when you consider the price of some of the tarmac and granite that's been installed recently.

Hi Kit... have been to buried to type, but I'm really pleased that you have created this petition and I will try to help when I get a bit more free time.


Can you do me two favours?


1. Can you post the direct url for the petition... it looks like the one you posted is diverted via Facebook somehow and it would be better to circulate a shorter url.


2. Can you give me the nearest house number to the treepit on Dunstans road, so that I can swing by and have a look?


I'm working out a cunning plan, more soon when I can type!

Hi Robin,


Sorry about the link! Is this any better? https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/preserve-southwark-s-street-trees


The house number I'm not sure about, but it is (or was) the only tree on the block, so if you're standing across from Balchier Road you can't miss it. It's been cropped down to a stump at this point.

catma Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have the same situation re a tree in my street -

> it was diseased so had to go but it was a lovely

> tree and with the new rules they won't replace.

> Although bins can be left all over the pavement,

> reducing the width with impunity it seems.


Ask the Lib Dems to take it up - they will back anything that will bag them votes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...