Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ah yes but before that the were commons rights, or at least the locals thought there were, and revolted. This was the genesis of the nature reserve (subsequently purchased by Camberwell Council in 1901 and dedicated to public use for ever).

https://archive.org/stream/storyofonetreehi00nisbrich#page/n0/mode/2up


The Rec has been in use for sports since the 60's I think but perhaps someone can confirm that. Though the council wanted to use the whole of the existing Camberwell New Cemetery, Rec and Allotments for burial, they didn't have planning consent and LCC had other ideas. Some reference to that on this forum, see posts from languagelounger:

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,645329,645338


So not strictly true that the Rec's use was meant to be temporary.

Save Southwark Woods campaign will not sacrifice any open land to save woods and graves in Camberwell Old Cemetery and on One Tree Hill in Camberwell New Cemetery.


That means the allotments, the rec, the nursery site and it means we will not accept digging up or mounding over any grave.


From what I know, Southwark Labour has kept the Rec, Nunhead Cemetery, and the allotments on the "table". Time to say: These places need permanence.


Tomorrow morning we demonstrate again at the destruction of trees, undergrowth and graves at Camberwell Old Cemetery. Meet at the gates at 9AM. SE22 0RU


Lewis Schaffer

Google "Lewis Schaffer" 41,000 web mentions, 3.5 Stars on trip advisor, See me live at the Ivy House on February 14, 2015 Valentines Day Sunday https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/save-southwark-woods-comedy-benefit-tickets-20846697032

"Saving the woods, graves and memories of the Camberwell Cemeteries, to rewild for 100 acres of Nature Reserves and 150 years of Londoners' history"


"Save Southwark Woods


Organiser of Save Southwark Woods Comedy Benefit


Community group fighting to save acres of nature conservation woods, tens of thousands of graves and 150 years of history at Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries - Southwark Woods, to make them 100 acres of Nature Reserves with respect for the dead and woods for the living."


When it comes to Mr Schaffer's comedy benefit it's now 100 acres?


Or has he found extra acres elsewhere?


Did Sue's question about the 14th February meeting get answered.


John K

HopOne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah yes but before that the were commons rights, or

> at least the locals thought there were, and

> revolted. This was the genesis of the nature

> reserve (subsequently purchased by Camberwell

> Council in 1901 and dedicated to public use for

> ever).


Oak Of Honor Hill had a history before Mr Nesbit's worthy book, but that discussion is better in the One Tree Hill thread.


John K

I ask again - where does Lewis think the money will be coming from to maintain his parks? - and if they are not maintained (they wouldn't be, no funding) how quickly does he think they will be sealed off as being unsafe - and then how quickly will fly-tipping start again? I would guess if he had his way they would be sealed off within 5 years (issues to do with gaping graves etc. etc.). Then they would be of 'use' to nobody. Best case scenario would be that the currently maintained areas would be kept open (for a bit) and the currently over-grown areas immediately sealed off. They would not be an amenity but an eye-sore. And he is not going to get support from the Church to stop burials - they are in favour of orderly re-use.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lewis will the trees be buried above the rotting

> remains of our loved ones?

>

> I'm a bit concerned about dead tree juice flowing

> down the road in to my fish pond.



Ah, don't mock, the man's grieving. Though that was very funny.


Does this mean it's all over?

Here is a video of Harriet Harman's party cutting down trees in Camberwell Old Cemetery today:



Harriet Harman kinda commented on cutting of trees in Camberwell Cemeteries in a tweet:


"Harriet Harman ‏@HarrietHarman Feb 1

Grt to discuss more local burial spaces & planting more trees in C?well Cemeteries w @MerrillDarren @WildLondon"


@wildlondon is the London Wildlife Trust is also supporting


Sign our petition and join our mailing list:

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-southwark-woods


Lewis Schaffer

Nunheader, tree lover.

edborders Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Announcement

>

> Funeral for the Trees and Bushes (and flowers and grasses, too)


If you decide to go for cremation, can we bring sausages and marshmallows? I do love a good BBQ.

Let's hope you have checked that your "funeral" does not clash with a real one tomorrow.


edborders Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Announcement

>

> Funeral for the Trees and Bushes (and flowers and

> grasses, too)

> Tomorrow Wednesday Meet 930AM Cortege 10AM

> Camberwell Old Cemetery Gates

> Forest Hill Road, East Dulwich

> SE22 0RU

> Wear black if possble.

>

> Lewis Schaffer

Do you have evidence of any grave being desecrated (by the council's works)? If you have this should be reported immediately. If you mean that self seeded trees in or over a grave were cut down - this isn't desecration. It's gardening.
yep, must agree the ssw twitter feed this morning in particular has been really, really amusing reporting the exploits to hold a funeral for a tree, as having been excluded from the cemetery, at least one arrest and best of all Lewis in a bowler hat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's like a Ealing comedy via twitter!


SSW turn up at main gate, mystery man blocks entrance with large vehicle, all run around to side entrance instead. Meanwhile, Jon/Dan Snow's brother manages to get himself arrested. For some reason, original plan then reinstated and all the SSWers run back to main entrance. 25-30 people (at least one dressed as the Grim Reaper) plus three dogs, all running around trying to get into a cemetery.


You can almost hear 'Yakkity Sax' being played in the background...

Jesus wept, what a collection of nasty little keyboard warriors there are on this thread.


Lewis S and SSW are trying to protect an area of woodland within a metropolitan area. They are not personally gaining out of this, they are doing it for the benefit of the community.

The personal attacks, goading and p*** taking towards him are nothing short of disgusting and cowardly.


The council have acted in a wholly dishonest and disingenuous manner about this. I have (unfortunately) had direct dealings with the council about this and quite frankly after their lies and obfuscation they have lost my trust and respect entirely. Regardless of your feelings about how the opposition to these plans are conducting themselves, can we assume you are content to have a council who lies to get their own way, and who's plans are so economically illiterate that they are wasting valuable funds to push these plans through then your moral compass is truly broken.


You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...