Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nuclear fusion will be a commercial reality one day.

The case was stronger 30 years ago when the world thought that they were running out of energy, including uranium.

Men and ladies in lab coats are still trusted and admired. It is governments that are not.

Without men and ladies in lab coats you would not be looking at your screen now.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nuclear fusion will be a commercial reality one

> day.

> The case was stronger 30 years ago when the world

> thought that they were running out of energy,

> including uranium.

That hasn't stopped tens of billions of dollars being spent on fusion in that time. And we're no nearer commercially realisable fusion power than we were 30 years ago.


> Men and ladies in lab coats are still trusted and

> admired.

Well, unless you're a climate scientist, work for Monsanto, 'big pharma' etc etc.


> Without men and ladies in lab coats you would not

> be looking at your screen now.

Or indeed Chinese miners toiling to get the coal to power the factories to make the screen. Science (actually, in these instances, technology) is lovely 'n' all, but it shouldn't be our religion.

Bolloks


We pvoved the concept and made it work.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_European_Torus


Don't blame scientists and engineers for exploiting others. Well at least not generically. Societies have been exploiting others since for zillions of years.


Without Blighty exploiting others, and the first world continuing to do this now, you wouldn't have the creature comforts and standard of living that you enjoy now.


Don't drag the men and ladies in white coats into this argument.


Go and find a cave and live in that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Crikey, £4 plus does seem excessive for one card, let alone twelve at that price! Did he explain why he wanted to spend so much? There could be many reasons. Did the recipients also send expensive cards? If so, rather than putting them in the recycling bin, you could just cut the handwritten bit off and send them to a different relative the following Christmas!
    • Does anyone have one they no longer need? Thanks 
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, North of East dulwich station is not covered by the Dulwich Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) Suburban requirements.  And 1978 was before this guidance was agreed.  Hi Jenijenjen, We have vacant sites and sites that for certain heights would likely become available. Giibs & Dandy vacant builders yard - neighbours I've spoken to of this site are extremely concerned about what the council may now approve. Kwik Fit, Goose Green Trading Estate instantly come to mind as sites where tall buildings would bring a significant offer to the freeholders to see the sites up. The Southwark Plan treats Giibs & Dandy + Kwik Fit as one site suitable for residential redevelopment. It also lists the Trading Estate for this as well. See page.84 https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf Do you think developers having seen the council approve a 9 storey redevelopment are more or less likely now to seek the same at other East Duwlcih locations?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...