Jump to content

Sleepyhead Deluxe Pod with spare cover (0-8 months)


Recommended Posts

I have a sleepyhead deluxe pod for sale with a spare cover. There is a "pristine white" cover currently on it (all freshly laundered)and the spare cover is in "celestial blue".


This pod and covers are in good condition having been used for just one baby for 6 months (he has now graduated to the next size up).


For sale for ?75. The pod retails for ?109 and the spare cover for ?39 so grab yourself a bargain. Comes from a smoke free and pet free house.


Have a look at the John Lewis website - the product gets rave reviews, giving babies and parents a great night's sleep. Babies seem to love it as they feel cocooned and safe in the pod.


Pick up is from SE15 (very close to Peckham Rye park).

Here's a bit about it

The Sleepyhead is a multi-functional, portable baby bed you can take anywhere.


Softer than a blanket or Moses basket, you can use it awake or sleeping, as a play pod, for tummy time or as a bed. The versatile Sleepyhead is a complete baby bed, made from breathable materials and the filling has anti-dustmite, anti-fungal and anti-bacterial properties.


The cover is made from 100% cotton and is machine washable, including the all-round bumper. The mattress has a waterproof, machine washable cover and a wadding pad that can be removed for easy hand-washing.


Suitable from 0-8 months.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree with you . Its as if they have their foot in the door and are just pushing and pushing. It's ridiculous. It's not the right space. they clearly do not give any regard to the environment or they would move it.  
    • There's a great badminton club at the Harris girls academy. It runs Friday from 5.30 to 6.45. for more experienced players, they have sessions on Wednesday and Friday, too but that's subject to skill levels 
    • There seem to be all sorts of blocks for this event being mounted on the Common, one is that it was 'designed especially' for the current site, though the organisers seem to have had absolutely no problem rejigging their plans to the original site footprint to expand the event to what we had last year- which I think really imposed on a large part of the park and spoilt the feel. I would suggest pressing very hard for relocation to the Common ( also closer to transport links). There must be a way, surely? If not, then wholesale relocation to a more suitable venue. I just do not think the park should be subjected to a festival-goer footfall of 60,000 plus over the summer.
    • I absolutely will. Fed up of property developments that are funded from offshore investors and price out local people. Fed up of the demise of social rents and the growing crisis of families in bed and breakfast. Fed up of young people being unable to save deposits, start families and generally have the same security of tenure that previous generations had. So yes, I will drill down into the financing, affordability, where the properties aer being advertised for sale, and how many are genuinely for social rent. Otherwise, no opposition to redeveloping that site in that way. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...