Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most of our gas and water mains were installed in Victorian times


That's (mainly) true of water (and sewage), but many gas mains locally post date this - in my house (c1912) work in the front discovered old (disconnected) gas installations which had later been replaced (these were contaminated and had to be removed by a specialist team) - so the gas installations in my part of ED are certainly post Victorian (as the ones actually replaced were Edwardian). Much ED building work and infrastructure post-dates the Victorian building boom and supporting infrastructure will as well. And there has been considerable remedial and replacement work since WWII. The amount of Victorian infrastructure remaining original in ED will now be very small (outwith 'feeder' links from houses into the mains).

Sorry to be boring about this, but from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/uk-markal/dodds-_-mcdowall-2013-future-gas-networks--energy-policy) it would suggest that most of the current gas infrastructure is far less than 100 or so years old - with the estimate of existing iron pipes being 50-100 only. 'Some' pipes are indeed estimated as being over 100 years, but by no means all. I have highlighted those sections which do support arguments for 'ancient' infrastructure - it should be noted that iron pipes (for gas) are much more robust than the pottery etc. water distribution and removal infrastructure.


2. Estimating the age of the UK gas network Future uses of the gas network depend on how long the existing infrastructure can be expected to remain in good working order. We estimate the age of each part of the existing network in this section.


Construction of the NTS began in the 1960s and the majority of the current network was built over a 10-year period (Williams, 1981). Transmission pipes have an expected lifetime of 80 years (National Grid, 2011b) so we expect the existing network to become obsolete from around 2050.


The mains distribution networks have been constructed over many decades as the number of customers has gradually increased and some pipes are now more than 100 years old. We have estimated the development of the networks using data from several sources (DECC, 2011c; ENA, 2010; Gas Council, 1960, 1970; Mitchell et al., 1990; Transco, 1999; Williams, 1981). The total length of the distribution networks was approximately proportional to the number of customers until around 1960, when construction of higher-pressure distribution pipes commenced to reconfigure the previously fragmented system for national gas delivery. This development added 50,000 km of pipes while the customers totalled 13 million (Fig. 1). The introduction of natural gas also enabled the huge increase in domestic gas consumption per customer since 1960 that is shown in Fig. 2. Estimating the age of the network is more complicated than finding the total length because pipes are occasionally replaced before the end of their life. It was necessary for us to estimate the replacement level, particularly in the early years, as described in Dodds and McDowall (2012a). ...


A more uncertain factor is the lifetime of the mains distribution pipes, particularly as polyethylene pipes have been used instead of iron pipes since 1970. The 89,000 km of iron pipes that remain in the system have been in service for between 50 and 100 years (HSE, 2001). There are little data to determine the lifetimes of polyethylene pipes; Ofgem assumes 50 years for accounting purposes (CEPA and Denton, 2010, p. 71) but a review of the Dutch network, which has used PVC pipes for more than 50 years, concluded that they will continue in service for many years to come (Visser et al., 2008). We assume an average lifetime of 80 years for both iron and polyethylene low-pressure pipes in this study. We examine the consequences of this assumption in a sensitivity study in Section 4.2.


Little data are available about service pipes. Mitchell et al. (1990) estimate the total length using an average service pipe length of 11.3 m per customer and we have adopted the same approach. Service pipes are smaller than mains pipes and are more likely to be replaced due to changes to the built environment; for example, between 1970 and 1990, 64% of the service pipes were replaced compared to only 24% of the distribution pipes (Mitchell et al., 1990). We assume a shorter average lifetime of 60 years for service pipes in this study.

Whose best interests are served by arguing for increased tariffs to 'pay' for necessary infrastructure improvements - and who can use age as an excuse for breakdowns and leaks. It is possible that all the ancient infrastructure left in the country is concentrated in SE London (which would at least be consistent with the failures to invest in roads and mass transport south or the river) - however I can recall programmes of replacement locally leading to road disruptions which would suggest there is some new infrastructure here, at last for gas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I didn't say wedge it "slightly" open. I meant to wedge it fully open. 
    • I have a rescue Spanish greyhound (galgo) from the charity mentioned above. You can contact Greyhounds in Need or one of the more local Kent greyhound rescue charities. They are fantastic family dogs. They do love walkies 2 or 3 times a day but they actually don't need to be walked too far and then they will happily loaf around on the sofa being very chill. They are brilliant with kids but not recommended if you own a cat as they have a strong prey drive. They also should be kept on the lead in local parks. They prefer to be around other sight-hounds (well my one does) and there are loads of local sighthound owners in Peckham, Crystal Palace etc and a very lively WhatsApp group that is brilliant if you need dog sitting as you can usually find someone to do that for free in return for you looking after the dog at a later date etc.
    • @Jenijenjen I assure you we are always polite and friendly too! Which is why the behaviour we have been receiving is so frustrating. The kids always leave her with a “Thank you have a lovely day”  Our concern is leaving the gate slightly wedged doesn’t stop the action of slamming it open and closed…still leading to damage  
    • If you're talking about who I think you are, I find them more exuberant than rude and usually smiling and polite. But then, I'm usually smiling and polite to them. Can you not wedge open your gate when you're expecting them?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...