Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most of our gas and water mains were installed in Victorian times


That's (mainly) true of water (and sewage), but many gas mains locally post date this - in my house (c1912) work in the front discovered old (disconnected) gas installations which had later been replaced (these were contaminated and had to be removed by a specialist team) - so the gas installations in my part of ED are certainly post Victorian (as the ones actually replaced were Edwardian). Much ED building work and infrastructure post-dates the Victorian building boom and supporting infrastructure will as well. And there has been considerable remedial and replacement work since WWII. The amount of Victorian infrastructure remaining original in ED will now be very small (outwith 'feeder' links from houses into the mains).

Sorry to be boring about this, but from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/uk-markal/dodds-_-mcdowall-2013-future-gas-networks--energy-policy) it would suggest that most of the current gas infrastructure is far less than 100 or so years old - with the estimate of existing iron pipes being 50-100 only. 'Some' pipes are indeed estimated as being over 100 years, but by no means all. I have highlighted those sections which do support arguments for 'ancient' infrastructure - it should be noted that iron pipes (for gas) are much more robust than the pottery etc. water distribution and removal infrastructure.


2. Estimating the age of the UK gas network Future uses of the gas network depend on how long the existing infrastructure can be expected to remain in good working order. We estimate the age of each part of the existing network in this section.


Construction of the NTS began in the 1960s and the majority of the current network was built over a 10-year period (Williams, 1981). Transmission pipes have an expected lifetime of 80 years (National Grid, 2011b) so we expect the existing network to become obsolete from around 2050.


The mains distribution networks have been constructed over many decades as the number of customers has gradually increased and some pipes are now more than 100 years old. We have estimated the development of the networks using data from several sources (DECC, 2011c; ENA, 2010; Gas Council, 1960, 1970; Mitchell et al., 1990; Transco, 1999; Williams, 1981). The total length of the distribution networks was approximately proportional to the number of customers until around 1960, when construction of higher-pressure distribution pipes commenced to reconfigure the previously fragmented system for national gas delivery. This development added 50,000 km of pipes while the customers totalled 13 million (Fig. 1). The introduction of natural gas also enabled the huge increase in domestic gas consumption per customer since 1960 that is shown in Fig. 2. Estimating the age of the network is more complicated than finding the total length because pipes are occasionally replaced before the end of their life. It was necessary for us to estimate the replacement level, particularly in the early years, as described in Dodds and McDowall (2012a). ...


A more uncertain factor is the lifetime of the mains distribution pipes, particularly as polyethylene pipes have been used instead of iron pipes since 1970. The 89,000 km of iron pipes that remain in the system have been in service for between 50 and 100 years (HSE, 2001). There are little data to determine the lifetimes of polyethylene pipes; Ofgem assumes 50 years for accounting purposes (CEPA and Denton, 2010, p. 71) but a review of the Dutch network, which has used PVC pipes for more than 50 years, concluded that they will continue in service for many years to come (Visser et al., 2008). We assume an average lifetime of 80 years for both iron and polyethylene low-pressure pipes in this study. We examine the consequences of this assumption in a sensitivity study in Section 4.2.


Little data are available about service pipes. Mitchell et al. (1990) estimate the total length using an average service pipe length of 11.3 m per customer and we have adopted the same approach. Service pipes are smaller than mains pipes and are more likely to be replaced due to changes to the built environment; for example, between 1970 and 1990, 64% of the service pipes were replaced compared to only 24% of the distribution pipes (Mitchell et al., 1990). We assume a shorter average lifetime of 60 years for service pipes in this study.

Whose best interests are served by arguing for increased tariffs to 'pay' for necessary infrastructure improvements - and who can use age as an excuse for breakdowns and leaks. It is possible that all the ancient infrastructure left in the country is concentrated in SE London (which would at least be consistent with the failures to invest in roads and mass transport south or the river) - however I can recall programmes of replacement locally leading to road disruptions which would suggest there is some new infrastructure here, at last for gas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened.
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
    • https://www.letslinkuk.net/ I'm interested to know why the OP didn't find this sort of scheme to work, as I would have thought it was much harder to find someone to do a direct exchange with? Does anybody else have experience of a scheme like this? Happy to be persuaded! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...